Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36814323›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Merging citizen science with epidemiology: design of a prospective feasibility study of health events and air pollution in Cologne, Germany.

Sara-Marie Soja, Robert Wegener, Natalie Kille, Stefanie Castell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara-Marie SojaDepartment for Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Inhoffenstr. 7, Brunswick, Lower Saxony, 38124, Germany.
Robert WegenerForschungszentrum Jülich, Institute for Energy and Climate Research, IEK-8: Troposphere, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, Jülich, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52428, Germany.
Natalie KilleForschungszentrum Jülich, Institute for Energy and Climate Research, IEK-8: Troposphere, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, Jülich, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52428, Germany.
Stefanie CastellDepartment for Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Inhoffenstr. 7, Brunswick, Lower Saxony, 38124, Germany. stefanie.castell@helmholtz-hzi.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1762-8462

Funding

Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft CS-0010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCitizen science as an approach to merge society and science is not a new paradigm. Yet it is not common in public health, epidemiology, or medical sciences. SMARAGD (Sensors for Measuring Aerosols and ReActive Gases to Deduce health effects) assesses air pollution at participants' homes or workplaces in Cologne, Germany, as feasibility study with a citizen science approach. Personal exposure to air pollutants is difficult to study, because the distribution of pollutants is heterogeneous, especially in urban areas. Targeted data collection allows to establish connections between air pollutant concentration and the health of the study population. Air pollution is among the most urgent health risks worldwide. Yet links of individualized pollution levels and respiratory infections remain to be validated, which also applies for the feasibility of the citizen science approach for epidemiological studies.

methodsWe co-designed a prospective feasibility study with two groups of volunteers from Cologne, Germany. These citizen scientists and researchers determined that low-cost air-quality sensors (hereafter low-cost sensors) were to be mounted at participants' homes/workplaces to acquire stationary data. The advantage of deploying low-cost sensors is the achievable physical proximity to the participants providing health data. Recruitment started in March 2021 and is currently ongoing (as of 09/22). Sensor units specifically developed for this study using commercially available electronic sensor components will measure particulate matter and trace gases such as ozone, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide. Health data are collected using the eResearch system "Prospective Management and Monitoring-App" (PIA). Due to the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, we also focus on COVID-19 as respiratory infection. DISCUSSION: Citizen science offers many benefits for science in general but also for epidemiological studies. It provides scientific information to society, enables scientific thinking in critical discourses, can counter anti-scientific ideologies, and takes into account the interests of society. However, it poses many challenges, as it requires extensive resources from researchers and society and can raise concerns regarding data protection and methodological challenges such as selection bias.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory infectionsAir pollutionCitizen scienceCOVID-19eResearchFeasibility studyLow-cost sensorm/eHealthSensor networkSymptom monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36814323
PMCPMC9944383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.