Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36814042›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2023

Outcome of liver transplantation in elderly patients: an Italian multicenter case-control study.

Fabio Melandro, Quirino Lai, Davide Ghinolfi, Tommaso Maria Manzia, Gabriele Spoletini, Massimo Rossi, Salvatore Agnes, Giuseppe Tisone, Paolo De Simone

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fabio Melandro *Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Umberto I Policlinico of Rome, Rome, Italy. fabmelan@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4056-9245
Quirino Lai *Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Umberto I Policlinico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Davide GhinolfiHepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Tommaso Maria ManziaHepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele SpoletiniGeneral Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Massimo RossiSapienza University of Rome, AOU Umberto I Policlinico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore AgnesGeneral Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe TisoneHepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Paolo De SimoneDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Biochemical Pathology and Intensive Care, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Policlinico Umberto I · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the controversial results of liver transplantation (LT) in elderly recipients, the proportion of patients continues to increase. This study investigated the outcome of LT in elderly patients (≥ 65 years) in an Italian, multicenter cohort. Between January 2014 and December 2019, 693 eligible patients were transplanted, and two groups were compared: recipients ≥ 65 years (n = 174, 25.1%) versus 50-59 years (n = 519, 74.9%). Confounders were balanced using a stabilized inverse probability therapy weighting (IPTW). Elderly patients showed more frequent early allograft dysfunction (23.9 versus 16.8%, p = 0.04). Control patients had longer posttransplant hospital stays (median: 14 versus 13 days; p = 0.02), while no difference was observed for posttransplant complications (p = 0.20). At multivariable analysis, recipient age ≥ 65 years was an independent risk factor for patient death (HR  1.76; p = 0.002) and graft loss (HR  1.63; p = 0.005). The 3-month, 1-year, and 5-year patient survival rates were 82.6, 79.8, and 66.4% versus 91.1, 88.5, and 82.0% in the elderly and control group, respectively (log-rank p = 0.001). The 3-month, 1-year, and 5-year graft survival rates were 81.5, 78.7, and 66.0% versus 90.2, 87.2, and 79.9% in the elderly and control group, respectively (log-rank p = 0.003). Elderly patients with CIT > 420 min showed 3-month, 1-year, and 5-year patient survival rates of 75.7%, 72.8%, and 58.5% versus 90.4%, 86.5%, and 79.4% for controls (log-rank p = 0.001). LT in elderly (≥ 65 years) recipients provides favorable results, but inferior to those achieved in younger patients (50-59), especially when CIT > 7 h. Containment of cold ischemia time seems pivotal for favorable outcomes in this class of patients.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationAgedCase-Control StudiesGraft SurvivalHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeCold Ischemia timeEarly allograft dysfunctionElderly recipientsLiver transplantation

Identifiers

PMID36814042
OpenAlexW4321502358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.