ArticleEye (London, England)2023
Structure-function relationship in glaucoma: Optical coherence tomography en face imaging vs. red-free fundus photography.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting HFA 30-2 Visual Fields with Deep Learning from Multimodal OCT-Fundus Feature Fusion and Structure-Function Discordance Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesTo analyse retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) defect measurements obtained from red-free fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) en face imaging, respectively, and to compare them for the strength of the structure-function association. SUBJECTS/
methodsTwo hundred and fifty-six glaucomatous eyes of 256 patients with localized RNFL defect on red-free fundus photography were enrolled. A subgroup analysis included 81 highly myopic eyes (≤ -6.0 dioptres). Angular width of RNFL defect was compared between red-free fundus photography (i.e., red-free RNFL defect) and OCT en face imaging (i.e., en face RNFL defect). The correlation between angular width of each RNFL defect and functional outcomes, reported as mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD), were assessed and compared.
resultsThe angular width of en face RNFL defect was measured smaller than that of red-free RNFL defect in 91.0% eyes (mean difference, 19.98°). The association of en face RNFL defect with MD and PSD was stronger (R
conclusionsEn face RNFL defect showed a higher correlation with severity of visual field loss than did red-free RNFL defect. The same dynamic was observed for highly myopic eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.