Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36813972›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2023

Development and validation of an intrinsic capacity composite score in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam: a formative approach.

Kaisa Koivunen, Emiel O Hoogendijk, Laura A Schaap, Martijn Huisman, Martijn W Heymans, Natasja M van Schoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Investigating Resilience Through Intrinsic Capacity Networks in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Challenge of Measuring Intrinsic Capacity.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaisa KoivunenEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. kaisa.m.koivunen@jyu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0710-0069
Emiel O HoogendijkEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laura A SchaapAging and Later Life, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn HuismanEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn W HeymansEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Natasja M van SchoorEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Academy of Finland 310526European Research Council 693045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrinsic capacity (IC) defined by the WHO refers to the composite of five domains of capacities. So far, developing and validating a standardized overall score of the concept have been challenging partly because its conceptual framework has been unclear. We consider that a person's IC is determined by its domain-specific indicators suggesting a formative measurement model.

aimsTo develop an IC score applying a formative approach and assess its validity.

methodsThe study sample (n = 1908) consisted of 57-88-year-old participants from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA). We used logistic regression models to select the indicators to the IC score with 6-year functional decline as an outcome. An IC score (range 0-100) was constructed for each participant. We examined the known-groups' validity of the IC score by comparing groups based on age and number of chronic diseases. The criterion validity of the IC score was assessed with 6-year functional decline and 10-year mortality as outcomes.

resultsThe constructed IC score included seven indicators covering all five domains of the construct. The mean IC score was 66.7 (SD 10.3). The scores were higher among younger participants and those who had lower number of chronic diseases. After adjustment for sociodemographic indicators, chronic diseases, and BMI, a one-point higher IC score was associated with a 7% decreased risk for 6-year functional decline and a 2% decreased risk for 10-year mortality.

conclusionsThe developed IC score demonstrated discriminative ability according to age and health status and is associated with subsequent functional decline and mortality.

Indexed as

AgingAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesFunctional abilityHealthy agingMeasurementWHO

Identifiers

PMID36813972
PMCPMC10115715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.