Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36813953›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Contributors to self-report motor function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Daniel Niederer, Natalie Mengis, Max Wießmeier, Matthias Keller, Wolf Petersen, Andree Ellermann, Tobias Drenck, Christian Schoepp, Amelie Stöhr, Andreas Fischer and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Daniel NiedererInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Department of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Ginnheimer Landstraße 39, 40487, Frankfurt, Germany. niederer@em.uni-frankfurt.de.
Natalie MengisArcus Sportklinik, Pforzheim, Germany.
Max WießmeierInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Department of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Ginnheimer Landstraße 39, 40487, Frankfurt, Germany.
Matthias KellerOSINSTITUT Ortho & Sport, Munich, Germany.
Wolf PetersenKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Berlin, Germany.
Andree EllermannArcus Sportklinik, Pforzheim, Germany.
Tobias DrenckBG Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian SchoeppBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany.
Amelie StöhrOrthopedic Surgery Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas FischerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Andrea AchtnichDepartment for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Raymond BestDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Sportklinik Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Lucia PinggeraDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Sportklinik Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Matthias KrauseDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Daniel GuentherDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Surgery, and Sports Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Maren JankoDepartment of Trauma, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christoph KittlUniversitätsklinikum Münster, Munster, Germany.
Turgay EfeOrthopaedicum Lich Giessen, Lich, Germany.
Karl-Friedrich SchüttlerOrthopaedicum Lich Giessen, Lich, Germany.
Lutz VogtDepartment of Sport Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Michael BehringerDepartment of Sport Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Thomas SteinSPORTHOLOGICUM Frankfurt - Center for Sport and Joint Injuries, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous functional factors may interactively contribute to the course of self-report functional abilities after anterior cruciate ligament  (ACL)-reconstruction. This study purposes to identify these predictors using exploratory moderation-mediation models in a cohort study design. Adults with post unilateral ACL reconstruction (hamstring graft) status and who were aiming to return to their pre-injury type and level of sport were included. Our dependent variables were self-reported function, as assessed by the the KOOS subscales sport (SPORT), and activities of daily living (ADL). The independent variables assessed were the KOOS subscale pain and the time since reconstruction [days]. All other variables (sociodemographic, injury-, surgery-, rehabilitation-specific, kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), and the presence or absence of COVID-19-associated restrictions) were further considered as moderators, mediators, or co-variates. Data from 203 participants (mean 26 years, SD 5 years) were finally modelled. Total variance explanation was 59% (KOOS-SPORT) and 47% (KOOS-ADL). In the initial rehabilitation phase (< 2 weeks after reconstruction), pain was the strongest contributor to self-report function (KOOS-SPORT: coefficient: 0.89; 95%-confidence-interval: 0.51 to 1.2 / KOOS-ADL: 1.1; 0.95 to 1.3). In the early phase (2-6 weeks after reconstruction), time since reconstruction [days] was the major contributor (KOOS-SPORT: 1.1; 0.14 to 2.1 / KOOS-ADL: 1.2; 0.43 to 2.0). Starting with the mid-phases of the rehabilitation, self-report function was no longer explicitly impacted by one or more contributors. The amount of rehabilitation [minutes] is affected by COVID-19-associated restrictions (pre-versus-post: - 672; - 1264 to - 80 for SPORT / - 633; - 1222 to - 45 for ADL) and by the pre-injury activity scale (280; 103 to 455 / 264; 90 to 438). Other hypothesised contributors such as sex/gender or age were not found to mediate the time or pain, rehabilitation dose and self-report function triangle. When self-report function is rated after an ACL reconstruction, the rehabilitation phases (early, mid, late), the potentially COVID-19-associated rehabilitation limitations, and pain intensity should also be considered. As, for example, pain is the strongest contributor to function in the early rehabilitation phase, focussing on the value of the self-report function only may, consequently, not be sufficient to rate bias-free function.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionCOVID-19Activities of Daily LivingAdultCohort StudiesHumansPainSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID36813953
PMCPMC9947165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.