Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36813868›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2023

Patients' perspectives towards biologic dose reduction in psoriasis: a qualitative study.

L S van der Schoot, L M Verhoef, I van Ee, F P A H van Oort, A H Pieterse, M M B Seyger, E M G J de Jong, J M P A van den Reek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L S van der SchootDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. lara.vanderschoot@radboudumc.nl.
L M VerhoefDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
I van EePsoriasispatiënten Nederland, Dutch National Psoriasis Patient Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.
F P A H van OortPsoriasispatiënten Nederland, Dutch National Psoriasis Patient Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.
A H PietersePsoriasispatiënten Nederland, Dutch National Psoriasis Patient Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.
M M B SeygerDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
E M G J de JongDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J M P A van den ReekDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLSint Maartenskliniek · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis could contribute to more efficient use of these expensive medicines. Evidence on opinions of patients with psoriasis regarding dose reduction is sparse. The objective of this study was therefore to explore patients' perspectives towards dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis. A qualitative study was conducted, comprising semi-structured interviews with 15 patients with psoriasis with different characteristics and treatment experiences. Interviews were analyzed by inductive thematic analysis. Perceived benefits of biologic dose reduction according to patients were minimizing medication use, lowering risks of adverse effects and lowering societal healthcare costs. Patients reported to have experienced a large impact of their psoriasis, and expressed concerns about loss of disease control due to dose reduction. Fast access to flare treatment and adequate monitoring of disease activity were among reported preconditions. According to patients, they should have confidence in dose reduction effects and should be willing to change their effective treatment. Moreover, addressing information needs and involvement in decision-making were deemed important among patients. In conclusion, addressing patients' concerns, fulfilling information needs, providing the possibility of resuming standard dose, and involving patients in decision-making are important according to patients with psoriasis when considering biologic dose reduction.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsPsoriasisDrug TaperingHealth Care CostsHumansTreatment OutcomeBiological ProductsBiologicsPatientsPsoriasisQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36813868
PMCPMC10338615
OpenAlexW4321482942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.