ArticleScientific reports2023
Evaluation and classification of obfuscated Android malware through deep learning using ensemble voting mechanism.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- OmBNNet: a resource-efficient FPGA-based obfuscated malware detection method using binarized neural network.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Few-shot android malware classification with quantum-enhanced prototypical learning and drift detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FM-DLM: A new method for image classification based on the fusion of multi-level deep learning models.PloS one · 2026Article
- Transfer learning with XAI for robust malware and IoT network security.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An accurate approach to discriminate android colluded malware from single app malware using permissions intelligence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- PermQRDroid: Android malware detection with novel attention layered mini-ResNet architecture over effective permission information image.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rise in popularity and usage of Android operating systems, malicious applications are targeted by applying innovative ways and techniques. Today, malware becomes intelligent that uses several ways of obfuscation techniques to hide its functionality and evade anti-malware engines. For mainstream smartphone users, Android malware poses a severe security danger. An obfuscation approach, however, can produce malware versions that can evade current detection strategies and dramatically lower the detection accuracy. Attempting to identify Android malware obfuscation variations, this paper proposes an approach to address the challenges and issues related to the classification and detection of malicious obfuscated variants. The employed detection and classification scheme uses both static and dynamic analysis using an ensemble voting mechanism. Moreover, this study demonstrates that a small subset of features performs consistently well when they are derived from the basic malware (non-obfuscated), however, after applying a novel feature-based obfuscation approach, the study shows a drastic change indicating the relative importance of these features in obfuscating benign and malware applications. For this purpose, we present a fast, scalable, and accurate mechanism for obfuscated Android malware detection based on the Deep learning algorithm using real and emulator-based platforms. The experiments show that the proposed model detects malware effectively and accurately along with the identification of features that are usually obfuscated by malware attackers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.