Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36813810›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Disentangling the causes of temporal variation in the opportunity for sexual selection.

Rômulo Carleial, Tommaso Pizzari, David S Richardson, Grant C McDonald

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rômulo CarleialDepartment of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK. r.carleial@kew.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8490-7202
Tommaso PizzariDepartment of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
David S RichardsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Grant C McDonaldDepartment of Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, 1077, Hungary. grant.mcdonald@univet.hu.ORCID 0000-0002-2864-9608
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In principle, temporal fluctuations in the potential for sexual selection can be estimated as changes in intrasexual variance in reproductive success (i.e. the opportunity for selection). However, we know little about how opportunity measures vary over time, and the extent to which such dynamics are affected by stochasticity. We use published mating data from multiple species to investigate temporal variation in the opportunity for sexual selection. First, we show that the opportunity for precopulatory sexual selection typically declines over successive days in both sexes and shorter sampling periods lead to substantial overestimates. Second, by utilising randomised null models, we also find that these dynamics are largely explained by an accumulation of random matings, but that intrasexual competition may slow temporal declines. Third, using data from a red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) population, we show that declines in precopulatory measures over a breeding period were mirrored by declines in the opportunity for both postcopulatory and total sexual selection. Collectively, we show that variance-based metrics of selection change rapidly, are highly sensitive to sampling durations, and likely lead to substantial misinterpretation if used as indicators of sexual selection. However, simulations can begin to disentangle stochastic variation from biological mechanisms.

Indexed as

Mating Preference, AnimalSexual SelectionAnimalsChickensFemaleMaleReproductionSexual Behavior, Animal

Identifiers

PMID36813810
PMCPMC9947164
OpenAlexW4321480869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.