ArticleScientific reports2023
In vitro to clinical translational pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of doxorubicin (DOX) and dexrazoxane (DEX) interactions: Safety assessment and optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic Applications of Natural Products in Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Interfacial Engineering of Biocompatible Nanocapsules for Near-Infrared-Triggered Drug Release and Photothermal Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- The Importance and Essentiality of Natural and Synthetic Chelators in Medicine: Increased Prospects for the Effective Treatment of Iron Overload and Iron Deficiency.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Network Pharmacology along with Molecular Docking to Explore the Mechanism of Danshen Injection against Anthracycline-induced Cardiotoxicity and Transcriptome Validation.Current pharmaceutical design · 2024Article
- Reliability of Metformin's protective effects against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: a meta-analysis of animal studies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Drug Selection and Posology, Optimal Therapies and Risk/Benefit Assessment in Medicine: The Paradigm of Iron-Chelating Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Iron Load Toxicity in Medicine: From Molecular and Cellular Aspects to Clinical Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The Vital Role Played by Deferiprone in the Transition of Thalassaemia from a Fatal to a Chronic Disease and Challenges in Its Repurposing for Use in Non-Iron-Loaded Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite high anticancer activity, doxorubicin (DOX)-induced cardiotoxicity (DIC) limits the extensive utility of DOX in a clinical setting. Amongst various strategies explored, dexrazoxane (DEX) remains the only cardioprotective agent to be approved for DIC. In addition, altering the dosing regimen of DOX has also proved to be somewhat beneficial in decreasing the risk of DIC. However, both approaches have limitations and further studies are required to better optimize them for maximal beneficial effects. In the present work, we quantitatively characterized DIC as well as the protective effects of DEX in an in vitro model of human cardiomyocytes, by means of experimental data and mathematical modeling and simulation (M&S) approaches. We developed a cellular-level, mathematical toxicodynamic (TD) model to capture the dynamic in vitro drug-drug interaction, and relevant parameters associated with DIC and DEX cardio-protection were estimated. Subsequently, we executed in vitro-in vivo translation by simulating clinical PK profiles for different dosing regimens of DOX alone and in combinations with DEX and using the simulated PK profiles to drive the cell-based TD models to evaluate the effects of long-term, clinical dosing regimens of these drugs on the relative cell viability of AC16 and to determine optimal drug combinations with minimal cellular toxicity. Here, we identified that the Q3W (once every three weeks) DOX regimen with 10:1 DEX:DOX dose ratio over three cycles (nine weeks) may offer maximal cardio-protection. Overall, the cell-based TD model can be effectively used to better design subsequent preclinical in vivo studies aimed for further optimizing safe and effective DOX and DEX combinations to mitigate DIC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.