ArticleScientific reports2023
Comparison of RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR with Rift valley fever virus (RVFV) RNA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Initial efforts of translational development of AAV-encoded NaMolecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Development of reference material from Rift Valley fever virus RNA.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Optimized Viability-ddPCR with Triton X-100 Enhancement for Selective Detection of LiveJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Development of a novel pseudovirus-based quality control material for HIV-1 nucleic acid testing and its application in external quality assessment.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Optimization of TaqMan-based quantitative PCR diagnosis for Entamoeba histolytica using droplet digital PCR.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- An Introduction to Rift Valley Fever Virus.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Universal primers for rift valley fever virus whole-genome sequencing.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rift valley fever (RVF) is an important zoonotic disease caused by the Rift valley fever virus (RVFV) which can affect ruminants and humans. In this study, a comparison was done of the reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and reverse transcription-droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) assays with synthesized RVFV RNA, cultured viral RNA, and mock clinical RVFV RNA samples. The genomic segments (L, M, and S) of three RVFV strains (BIME01, Kenya56, and ZH548) were synthesized and used as templates for in vitro transcription (IVT). Both the RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR assays for RVFV did not react with any of the negative reference viral genomes. Thus, both the RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR assays are specific to RVFV. The comparison of both the RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR assays with serially diluted templates showed that the LoD of both assays are similar, and a concordant of the results was observed. The LoD of both assays reached the practical measurable minimum concentration. Taken altogether, the sensitivity of the RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR assays is similar, and the material measured by RT-ddPCR can be used as a reference material for RT-qPCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.