Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36813503›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2023

Inhaled ciclesonide in adults hospitalised with COVID-19: a randomised controlled open-label trial (HALT COVID-19).

Daniel Brodin, Per Tornhammar, Peter Ueda, Anders Krifors, Eli Westerlund, Simon Athlin, Sandra Wojt, Olof Elvstam, Anca Neumann, Arsim Elshani and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04381364 (Inhalation of Ciclesonide for Patients With COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04381364 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Inhalation of Ciclesonide for Patients With COVID-19: A Randomised Open Treatment Study (HALT COVID-19)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOla Blennow, MD, PhDRan2020 to 2022Enrolled98ConditionsCovid-19, Pneumonia, Viral, Sars-CoV2ArmsCiclesonide Inhalation Aerosol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Corticosteroids in COVID-19: pros and cons.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Brodin *Department of Medicine, Capio S:t Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per Tornhammar *Functional Area of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1043-1894
Peter Ueda *Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders KriforsDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eli WesterlundDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5453-1796
Simon AthlinSchool of Medical Science, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Sandra WojtDepartment of Internal Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olof ElvstamDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Central Hospital Växjö, Vaxjo, Sweden.
Anca NeumannDepartment of Medicine, Capio S:t Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Arsim ElshaniDepartment of Medicine and Geriatrics, Karlskoga Hospital, Karlskoga, Sweden.
Julia GieseckeFunctional Area of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jens Edvardsson-KällkvistKarolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sayam BunpuckdeeFunctional Area of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christian UngeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin LarssonDepartment of Endocrinology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Björn JohanssonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Halland's Hospital Halmstad, Halmstad, Sweden.
Johan LjungbergDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Halland's Hospital Halmstad, Halmstad, Sweden.
Jonas LindellDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Visby Hospital, Visby, Sweden.
Johan HanssonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Östersund Hospital, Ostersund, Sweden.
Ola Blennow *Department of Medicine, Capio S:t Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden ola.blennow@regionstockholm.se.
Daniel Peter Andersson *Department of Medicine Huddinge H7, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4655-4837
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEDanderyds sjukhus · SEHallands sjukhus Halmstad · SESaint Göran Hospital · SEÖrebro University · SEÖstersunds Hospital · SEUppsala University · SEVäxjö Kommun · SEVisby lasarett · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the efficacy of inhaled ciclesonide in reducing the duration of oxygen therapy (an indicator of time to clinical improvement) among adults hospitalised with COVID-19.

designMulticentre, randomised, controlled, open-label trial.

setting9 hospitals (3 academic hospitals and 6 non-academic hospitals) in Sweden between 1 June 2020 and 17 May 2021.

participantsAdults hospitalised with COVID-19 and receiving oxygen therapy.

interventionInhaled ciclesonide 320 µg two times a day for 14 days versus standard care.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcome was duration of oxygen therapy, an indicator of time to clinical improvement. Key secondary outcome was a composite of invasive mechanical ventilation/death.

resultsData from 98 participants were analysed (48 receiving ciclesonide and 50 receiving standard care; median (IQR) age, 59.5 (49-67) years; 67 (68%) men). Median (IQR) duration of oxygen therapy was 5.5 (3-9) days in the ciclesonide group and 4 (2-7) days in the standard care group (HR for termination of oxygen therapy 0.73 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.11), with the upper 95% CI being compatible with a 10% relative reduction in oxygen therapy duration, corresponding to a <1 day absolute reduction in a post-hoc calculation). Three participants in each group died/received invasive mechanical ventilation (HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.15 to 5.32)). The trial was discontinued early due to slow enrolment.

conclusionsIn patients hospitalised with COVID-19 receiving oxygen therapy, this trial ruled out, with 0.95 confidence, a treatment effect of ciclesonide corresponding to more than a 1 day reduction in duration of oxygen therapy. Ciclesonide is unlikely to improve this outcome meaningfully. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04381364.

Indexed as

COVID-19PregnenedionesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygenSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeciclesonideOxygenPregnenedionesclinical trialsCOVID-19respiratory infections

Identifiers

PMID36813503
PMCPMC9950582
OpenAlexW4321503880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.