Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36813500›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2023

Pregnancy, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in women exposed to physician-related occupational hazards: a scoping review.

Candace M Marsters, Lenka Stafl, Sarah Bugden, Rita Gustainis, Victoria Nkunu, Renee Reimer, Sarah Fletcher, Stephanie Smith, Moss Bruton Joe, Christine Hyde and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisScoping Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Candace M MarstersDepartment of Neurology, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lenka StaflDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sarah BugdenMemorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Rita GustainisUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Victoria NkunuDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8508-6282
Renee ReimerUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sarah FletcherUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Stephanie SmithDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Moss Bruton JoeDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Christine HydeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Erica DanceDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Shannon M RuzyckiDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada shannon.ruzycki@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8122-2910
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvidence is needed to guide organisational decision making about workplace accommodations for pregnant physicians. Our objective was to characterise the strengths and limitations of current research examining the association between physician-related occupational hazards with pregnancy, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.

designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL/ EBSCO, SciVerse Scopus and Web of Science/Knowledge were searched from inception to 2 April 2020. A grey literature search was performed on 5 April 2020. The references of all included articles were hand searched for additional citations. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English language citations that studied employed pregnant people and any 'physician-related occupational hazards', meaning any relevant physical, infectious, chemical or psychological hazard, were included. Outcomes included any pregnancy, obstetrical or neonatal complication. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Physician-related occupational hazards included physician work, healthcare work, long work hours, 'demanding' work, disordered sleep, night shifts and exposure to radiation, chemotherapy, anaesthetic gases or infectious disease. Data were extracted independently in duplicate and reconciled through discussion.

resultsOf the 316 included citations, 189 were original research studies. Most were retrospective, observational and included women in any occupation rather than healthcare workers. Methods for exposure and outcome ascertainment varied across studies and most studies had a high risk of bias in data ascertainment. Most exposures and outcomes were defined categorically and results from different studies could not be combined in a meta-analysis due to heterogeneity in how these categories were defined. Overall, some data suggested that healthcare workers may have an increased risk of miscarriage compared with other employed women. Long work hours may be associated with miscarriage and preterm birth.

conclusionsThere are important limitations in the current evidence examining physician-related occupational hazards and adverse pregnancy, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. It is not clear how the medical workplace should be accommodated to improve outcomes for pregnant physicians. High-quality studies are needed and likely feasible.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousPhysiciansPremature BirthFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective Studieshealth policymaternal medicineoccupational & industrial medicine

Identifiers

PMID36813500
PMCPMC9950931
OpenAlexW4321503767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.