Observational studyNeonatology2023
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Evaluation of Anatomy and Outcome Prediction in Infants with Esophageal Atresia.
Observational study in Neonatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling tracheo-oesophageal fistula: The crucial role of imaging in the diagnosis and management.SA journal of radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThere is currently no validated diagnostic modality to characterize the anatomy and predict outcomes of tracheal esophageal defects, such as esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheal esophageal fistulas (TEFs). We hypothesized that ultra-short echo-time MRI would provide enhanced anatomic information allowing for evaluation of specific EA/TEF anatomy and identification of risk factors that predict outcome in infants with EA/TEF.
methodsIn this observational study, 11 infants had pre-repair ultra-short echo-time MRI of the chest completed. Esophageal size was measured at the widest point distal to the epiglottis and proximal to the carina. Angle of tracheal deviation was measured by identifying the initial point of deviation and the farthest lateral point proximal to the carina.
resultsInfants without a proximal TEF had a larger proximal esophageal diameter (13.5 ± 5.1 mm vs. 6.8 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.07) when compared to infants with a proximal TEF. The angle of tracheal deviation in infants without a proximal TEF was larger than infants with a proximal TEF (16.1 ± 6.1° vs. 8.2 ± 5.4°, p = 0.09) and controls (16.1 ± 6.1° vs. 8.0 ± 3.1°, p = 0.005). An increase in the angle of tracheal deviation was positively correlated with duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation (Pearson r = 0.83, p < 0.002) and total duration of post-operative respiratory support (Pearson r = 0.80, p = 0.004). DISCUSSION: These results demonstrate that infants without a proximal TEF have a larger proximal esophagus and a greater angle of tracheal deviation which is directly correlated with the need for longer post-operative respiratory support. Additionally, these results demonstrate that MRI is a useful tool to assess the anatomy of EA/TEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.