ArticlePLOS digital health2023
Machine-learning-based Web system for the prediction of chronic kidney disease progression and mortality.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mathematical expansion and clinical application of chronic kidney disease stage as vector field.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Prediction of Five-Year Mortality Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Models: A Retrospective Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of estimated glomerular filtration rate slope and kidney prognosis of patients with chronic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of Imminent Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis Using Time-Updated Electronic Health Records and Machine Learning: A Temporal Validation Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- CKD-M2 study: 2-year mortality prediction tool for advanced kidney disease.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Stacking ensemble model for predicting chronic kidney disease in the Uddanam region of India with unknown etiology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Noninvasive prediction of T-score in IgA nephropathy using machine learning within the Oxford classification system.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Ensemble machine learning for predicting renal function decline in chronic kidney disease: development and external validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based diagnostic prediction of minimal change disease: model development study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Klotho-Based Machine Learning Model for Prediction of both Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based diagnostic prediction of IgA nephropathy: model development and validation study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Optimizing Care Delivery in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Roundtable Discussion and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- New marker for chronic kidney disease progression and mortality in medical-word virtual space.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have high risks of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and pre-ESKD death. Therefore, accurately predicting these outcomes is useful among CKD patients, especially in those who are at high risk. Thus, we evaluated whether a machine-learning system can predict accurately these risks in CKD patients and attempted its application by developing a Web-based risk-prediction system. We developed 16 risk-prediction machine-learning models using Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting with 22 variables or selected variables for the prediction of the primary outcome (ESKD or death) on the basis of repeatedly measured data of CKD patients (n = 3,714; repeatedly measured data, n = 66,981) in their electronic-medical records. The performances of the models were evaluated using data from a cohort study of CKD patients carried out over 3 years (n = 26,906). One RF model with 22 variables and another RF model with 8 variables of time-series data showed high accuracies of the prediction of the outcomes and were selected for use in a risk-prediction system. In the validation, the 22- and 8-variable RF models showed high C-statistics for the prediction of the outcomes: 0.932 (95% CI 0.916, 0.948) and 0.93 (0.915, 0.945), respectively. Cox proportional hazards models using splines showed a highly significant relationship between the high probability and high risk of an outcome (p<0.0001). Moreover, the risks of patients with high probabilities were higher than those with low probabilities: 22-variable model, hazard ratio of 104.9 (95% CI 70.81, 155.3); 8-variable model, 90.9 (95% CI 62.29, 132.7). Then, a Web-based risk-prediction system was actually developed for the implementation of the models in clinical practice. This study showed that a machine-learning-based Web system is a useful tool for the risk prediction and treatment of CKD patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.