Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36812600›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2022

Is artificial intelligence capable of generating hospital discharge summaries from inpatient records?

Kenichiro Ando, Takashi Okumura, Mamoru Komachi, Hiromasa Horiguchi, Yuji Matsumoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Large Language Models with Temporal Reasoning for Longitudinal Clinical Summarization and Prediction.Findings of ACL. EMNLP. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ChatGPT in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kenichiro AndoGraduate School of Systems Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0906-9891
Takashi OkumuraSchool of Regional Innovation and Social Design Engineering, Kitami Institute of Technology, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8643-2864
Mamoru KomachiGraduate School of Systems Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromasa HoriguchiNational Hospital Organization, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji MatsumotoCenter for Advanced Intelligence Project, RIKEN, Tokyo, Japan.
RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project · JPKitami Institute of Technology · JPTokyo Metropolitan University · JPTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical professionals have been burdened by clerical work, and artificial intelligence may efficiently support physicians by generating clinical summaries. However, whether hospital discharge summaries can be generated automatically from inpatient records stored in electronic health records remains unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the sources of information in discharge summaries. First, the discharge summaries were automatically split into fine-grained segments, such as those representing medical expressions, using a machine learning model from a previous study. Second, these segments in the discharge summaries that did not originate from inpatient records were filtered out. This was performed by calculating the n-gram overlap between inpatient records and discharge summaries. The final source origin decision was made manually. Finally, to reveal the specific sources (e.g., referral documents, prescriptions, and physician's memory) from which the segments originated, they were manually classified by consulting medical professionals. For further and deeper analysis, this study designed and annotated clinical role labels that represent the subjectivity of the expressions and builds a machine learning model to assign them automatically. The analysis results revealed the following: First, 39% of the information in the discharge summary originated from external sources other than inpatient records. Second, patient's past clinical records constituted 43%, and patient referral documents constituted 18% of the expressions derived from external sources. Third, 11% of the missing information was not derived from any documents. These are possibly derived from physicians' memories or reasoning. According to these results, end-to-end summarization using machine learning is considered infeasible. Machine summarization with an assisted post-editing process is the best fit for this problem domain.

Identifiers

PMID36812600
PMCPMC9931331
OpenAlexW4311180795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.