Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36812592›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2023

Artificial intelligence model for analyzing colonic endoscopy images to detect changes associated with irritable bowel syndrome.

Kazuhisa Tabata, Hiroshi Mihara, Sohachi Nanjo, Iori Motoo, Takayuki Ando, Akira Teramoto, Haruka Fujinami, Ichiro Yasuda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. How AI Will Transform the Care of Patients With DGBIs.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kazuhisa Tabata3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Hiroshi Mihara3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8427-2868
Sohachi Nanjo3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Iori Motoo3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Takayuki Ando3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Akira Teramoto3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4031-3012
Haruka Fujinami3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Ichiro Yasuda3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
University of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IBS is not considered to be an organic disease and usually shows no abnormality on lower gastrointestinal endoscopy, although biofilm formation, dysbiosis, and histological microinflammation have recently been reported in patients with IBS. In this study, we investigated whether an artificial intelligence (AI) colorectal image model can identify minute endoscopic changes, which cannot typically be detected by human investigators, that are associated with IBS. Study subjects were identified based on electronic medical records and categorized as IBS (Group I; n = 11), IBS with predominant constipation (IBS-C; Group C; n = 12), and IBS with predominant diarrhea (IBS-D; Group D; n = 12). The study subjects had no other diseases. Colonoscopy images from IBS patients and from asymptomatic healthy subjects (Group N; n = 88) were obtained. Google Cloud Platform AutoML Vision (single-label classification) was used to construct AI image models to calculate sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and AUC. A total of 2479, 382, 538, and 484 images were randomly selected for Groups N, I, C and D, respectively. The AUC of the model discriminating between Group N and I was 0.95. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Group I detection were 30.8%, 97.6%, 66.7%, and 90.2%, respectively. The overall AUC of the model discriminating between Groups N, C, and D was 0.83; sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of Group N were 87.5%, 46.2%, and 79.9%, respectively. Using the image AI model, colonoscopy images of IBS could be discriminated from healthy subjects at AUC 0.95. Prospective studies are needed to further validate whether this externally validated model has similar diagnostic capabilities at other facilities and whether it can be used to determine treatment efficacy.

Identifiers

PMID36812592
PMCPMC9937744
OpenAlexW4321187733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.