Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36812584›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2022

Integrating psychosocial variables and societal diversity in epidemic models for predicting COVID-19 transmission dynamics.

Viktor K Jirsa, Spase Petkoski, Huifang Wang, Marmaduke Woodman, Jan Fousek, Cornelia Betsch, Lisa Felgendreff, Robert Bohm, Lau Lilleholt, Ingo Zettler and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The psychological ability to adopt recommended coping responses reduced infections during the COVID-19 pandemic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Viktor K JirsaInstitut de Neurosciences des Systèmes UMR INSERM 1106, Aix-Marseille Université.
Spase PetkoskiInstitut de Neurosciences des Systèmes UMR INSERM 1106, Aix-Marseille Université.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4540-6293
Huifang WangInstitut de Neurosciences des Systèmes UMR INSERM 1106, Aix-Marseille Université.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4060-8649
Marmaduke WoodmanInstitut de Neurosciences des Systèmes UMR INSERM 1106, Aix-Marseille Université.
Jan FousekInstitut de Neurosciences des Systèmes UMR INSERM 1106, Aix-Marseille Université.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-2956
Cornelia BetschUniversity of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-7303
Lisa FelgendreffUniversity of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8356-8061
Robert BohmFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6806-0374
Lau LilleholtDepartment of Psychology and Copenhagen Center for Social Data Science (SODAS) University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-2636
Ingo ZettlerDepartment of Psychology and Copenhagen Center for Social Data Science (SODAS) University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-7160
Sarah FaberRotman Research Institute of Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0950-354X
Kelly ShenRotman Research Institute of Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Anthony Randal McintoshRotman Research Institute of Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1784-5662

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the current COVID-19 pandemic, governments must make decisions based on a variety of information including estimations of infection spread, health care capacity, economic and psychosocial considerations. The disparate validity of current short-term forecasts of these factors is a major challenge to governments. By causally linking an established epidemiological spread model with dynamically evolving psychosocial variables, using Bayesian inference we estimate the strength and direction of these interactions for German and Danish data of disease spread, human mobility, and psychosocial factors based on the serial cross-sectional COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO; N = 16,981). We demonstrate that the strength of cumulative influence of psychosocial variables on infection rates is of a similar magnitude as the influence of physical distancing. We further show that the efficacy of political interventions to contain the disease strongly depends on societal diversity, in particular group-specific sensitivity to affective risk perception. As a consequence, the model may assist in quantifying the effect and timing of interventions, forecasting future scenarios, and differentiating the impact on diverse groups as a function of their societal organization. Importantly, the careful handling of societal factors, including support to the more vulnerable groups, adds another direct instrument to the battery of political interventions fighting epidemic spread.

Identifiers

PMID36812584
PMCPMC9931295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.