Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36812556›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2022

Point-of-care motion capture and biomechanical assessment improve clinical utility of dynamic balance testing for lower extremity osteoarthritis.

Ryan T Halvorson, Francine T Castillo, Fayyaz Ahamed, Karim Khattab, Aaron Scheffler, Robert P Matthew, Jeffrey Lotz, Thomas P Vail, Brian T Feeley, Jeannie F Bailey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sex-based differences in biomechanical function for chronic low back pain and how it relates to pain experience.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan T HalvorsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6237-1718
Francine T CastilloSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, United States of America.
Fayyaz AhamedSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, United States of America.
Karim KhattabDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, United States of America.
Aaron SchefflerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, United States of America.
Robert P MatthewDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, University of California San Francisco, United States of America.
Jeffrey LotzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, United States of America.
Thomas P VailDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, United States of America.
Brian T FeeleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, United States of America.
Jeannie F BaileyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, United States of America.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal conditions impede patient biomechanical function. However, clinicians rely on subjective functional assessments with poor test characteristics for biomechanical outcomes because more advanced assessments are impractical in the ambulatory care setting. Using markerless motion capture (MMC) in clinic to record time-series joint position data, we implemented a spatiotemporal assessment of patient kinematics during lower extremity functional testing to evaluate whether kinematic models could identify disease states beyond conventional clinical scoring. 213 trials of the star excursion balance test (SEBT) were recorded by 36 subjects during routine ambulatory clinic visits using both MMC technology and conventional clinician scoring. Conventional clinical scoring failed to distinguish patients with symptomatic lower extremity osteoarthritis (OA) from healthy controls in each component of the assessment. However, principal component analysis of shape models generated from MMC recordings revealed significant differences in subject posture between the OA and control cohorts for six of the eight components. Additionally, time-series models of subject posture change over time revealed distinct movement patterns and reduced overall postural change in the OA cohort compared to the controls. Finally, a novel metric quantifying postural control was derived from subject specific kinematic models and was shown to distinguish OA (1.69), asymptomatic postoperative (1.27), and control (1.23) cohorts (p = 0.0025) and to correlate with patient-reported OA symptom severity (R = -0.72, p = 0.018). Time series motion data have superior discriminative validity and clinical utility than conventional functional assessments in the case of the SEBT. Novel spatiotemporal assessment approaches can enable routine in-clinic collection of objective patient-specific biomechanical data for clinical decision-making and monitoring recovery.

Identifiers

PMID36812556
PMCPMC9931224
OpenAlexW4284706963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.