Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36812553›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2022

No sonographer, no radiologist: Assessing accuracy of artificial intelligence on breast ultrasound volume sweep imaging scans.

Thomas J Marini, Benjamin Castaneda, Kevin Parker, Timothy M Baran, Stefano Romero, Radha Iyer, Yu T Zhao, Zaegyoo Hah, Moon Ho Park, Galen Brennan and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas J MariniDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1529-5097
Benjamin CastanedaDepartamento de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru.
Kevin ParkerDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-6605
Timothy M BaranDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4476-5609
Stefano RomeroDepartamento de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6092-1395
Radha IyerDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Yu T ZhaoDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Zaegyoo HahSamsung Medison Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Moon Ho ParkSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1835-2077
Galen BrennanDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Jonah KanDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Steven MengDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Ann DozierDepartment of Public Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Avice O'ConnellDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
University of Rochester Medical Center · USPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú · PESamsung (South Korea) · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast ultrasound provides a first-line evaluation for breast masses, but the majority of the world lacks access to any form of diagnostic imaging. In this pilot study, we assessed the combination of artificial intelligence (Samsung S-Detect for Breast) with volume sweep imaging (VSI) ultrasound scans to evaluate the possibility of inexpensive, fully automated breast ultrasound acquisition and preliminary interpretation without an experienced sonographer or radiologist. This study was conducted using examinations from a curated data set from a previously published clinical study of breast VSI. Examinations in this data set were obtained by medical students without prior ultrasound experience who performed VSI using a portable Butterfly iQ ultrasound probe. Standard of care ultrasound exams were performed concurrently by an experienced sonographer using a high-end ultrasound machine. Expert-selected VSI images and standard of care images were input into S-Detect which output mass features and classification as "possibly benign" and "possibly malignant." Subsequent comparison of the S-Detect VSI report was made between 1) the standard of care ultrasound report by an expert radiologist, 2) the standard of care ultrasound S-Detect report, 3) the VSI report by an expert radiologist, and 4) the pathological diagnosis. There were 115 masses analyzed by S-Detect from the curated data set. There was substantial agreement of the S-Detect interpretation of VSI among cancers, cysts, fibroadenomas, and lipomas to the expert standard of care ultrasound report (Cohen's κ = 0.73 (0.57-0.9 95% CI), p<0.0001), the standard of care ultrasound S-Detect interpretation (Cohen's κ = 0.79 (0.65-0.94 95% CI), p<0.0001), the expert VSI ultrasound report (Cohen's κ = 0.73 (0.57-0.9 95% CI), p<0.0001), and the pathological diagnosis (Cohen's κ = 0.80 (0.64-0.95 95% CI), p<0.0001). All pathologically proven cancers (n = 20) were designated as "possibly malignant" by S-Detect with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 86%. Integration of artificial intelligence and VSI could allow both acquisition and interpretation of ultrasound images without a sonographer and radiologist. This approach holds potential for increasing access to ultrasound imaging and therefore improving outcomes related to breast cancer in low- and middle- income countries.

Identifiers

PMID36812553
PMCPMC9931251
OpenAlexW4309796351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.