Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36812518›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2022

Applied machine learning for the risk-stratification and clinical decision support of hospitalised patients with dengue in Vietnam.

Damien K Ming, Bernard Hernandez, Sorawat Sangkaew, Nguyen Lam Vuong, Phung Khanh Lam, Nguyen Minh Nguyet, Dong Thi Hoai Tam, Dinh The Trung, Nguyen Thi Hanh Tien, Nguyen Minh Tuan and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Damien K MingDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3125-6378
Bernard HernandezCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1010-3559
Sorawat SangkaewCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1862-0879
Nguyen Lam VuongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2684-3041
Phung Khanh LamOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7968-473X
Nguyen Minh NguyetOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5960-7849
Dong Thi Hoai TamOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4424-451X
Dinh The TrungOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thi Hanh TienOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Minh TuanOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8058-7750
Nguyen Van Vinh ChauOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Cao Thi TamHospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Ho Quang ChanhOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1840-0868
Huynh Trung TrieuOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-6548
Cameron P SimmonsInstitute of Vector Borne Disease, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Bridget WillsOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-8804
Pantelis GeorgiouCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2476-3857
Alison H HolmesCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5554-5743
Sophie YacoubOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2910-7819
Vietnam ICU Translational Applications Laboratory (VITAL) investigators
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNImperial College London · GBUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City · VNUniversity of Oxford · GBHospital for Tropical Diseases · VNMonash University · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying patients at risk of dengue shock syndrome (DSS) is vital for effective healthcare delivery. This can be challenging in endemic settings because of high caseloads and limited resources. Machine learning models trained using clinical data could support decision-making in this context.

methodsWe developed supervised machine learning prediction models using pooled data from adult and paediatric patients hospitalised with dengue. Individuals from 5 prospective clinical studies in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam conducted between 12th April 2001 and 30th January 2018 were included. The outcome was onset of dengue shock syndrome during hospitalisation. Data underwent random stratified splitting at 80:20 ratio with the former used only for model development. Ten-fold cross-validation was used for hyperparameter optimisation and confidence intervals derived from percentile bootstrapping. Optimised models were evaluated against the hold-out set.

findingsThe final dataset included 4,131 patients (477 adults and 3,654 children). DSS was experienced by 222 (5.4%) of individuals. Predictors were age, sex, weight, day of illness at hospitalisation, indices of haematocrit and platelets over first 48 hours of admission and before the onset of DSS. An artificial neural network model (ANN) model had best performance with an area under receiver operator curve (AUROC) of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.85) in predicting DSS. When evaluated against the independent hold-out set this calibrated model exhibited an AUROC of 0.82, specificity of 0.84, sensitivity of 0.66, positive predictive value of 0.18 and negative predictive value of 0.98.

interpretationThe study demonstrates additional insights can be obtained from basic healthcare data, when applied through a machine learning framework. The high negative predictive value could support interventions such as early discharge or ambulatory patient management in this population. Work is underway to incorporate these findings into an electronic clinical decision support system to guide individual patient management.

Identifiers

PMID36812518
PMCPMC9931311
OpenAlexW4206827170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.