Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36812287›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

In vivo osseointegration evaluation of implants coated with nanostructured hydroxyapatite in low density bone.

Daniel Almeida, Suelen Cristina Sartoretto, Jose de Albuquerque Calasans-Maia, Bruna Ghiraldini, Fabio Jose Barbosa Bezerra, Jose Mauro Granjeiro, Mônica Diuana Calasans-Maia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel AlmeidaDentistry School, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1918-0999
Suelen Cristina SartorettoDepartment of Oral Surgery, Dentistry School, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil.
Jose de Albuquerque Calasans-MaiaOrthodontics Department, Dentistry School, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Bruna GhiraldiniDental Research Division, Dentistry School, Universidade Paulista, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fabio Jose Barbosa BezerraDental Research Division, Dentistry School, Universidade Paulista, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Jose Mauro GranjeiroClinical Research Laboratory, Dentistry School, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Mônica Diuana Calasans-MaiaClinical Research Laboratory, Dentistry School, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversidade Paulista · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis in vivo study, aimed to biomechanically, histomorphometrically and histologically evaluate an implant surface coated with nanostructured hydroxyapatite using the wet chemical process (biomimetic deposition of calcium phosphate coating) when compared to a dual acid-etching surface. MATERIAL AND

methodsTen sheep (2-4 years old) received 20 implants, 10 with nanostructured hydroxyapatite coating (HAnano), and 10 with dual acid-etching surface (DAA). The surfaces were characterized with scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy; insertion torque values and resonance frequency analysis were measured to evaluate the primary stability of the implants. Bone-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFo) were evaluated 14 and 28 days after implant installation.

resultsThe HAnano and DAA groups showed no significant difference in insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis. The BIC and BAFo values increased significantly (p<0.05) over the experimental periods in both groups. This event was also observed in BIC value of HAnano group. The HAnano surface showed superior results compared to DAA after 28 days (BAFo, p = 0.007; BIC, p = 0.01).

conclusionThe results suggest that the HAnano surface favors bone formation when compared to the DAA surface after 28 days in low-density bone in sheep.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsOsseointegrationAnimalsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDurapatiteSheepSurface PropertiesTitaniumCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDental ImplantsDurapatiteTitanium

Identifiers

PMID36812287
PMCPMC9946243
OpenAlexW4321482435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.