SynthesisPloS one2023
Progestogens for maintenance tocolysis in symptomatic women. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePrevention of preterm birth (PTB) with progestogens after an episode of threatened preterm labour is still controversial. As different progestogens have distinct molecular structures and biological effects, we conducted a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis to investigate the individual role played by 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-HP), vaginal progesterone (Vaginal P) and oral progesterone (Oral P).
methodsThe search was performed in MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to 31 October 2021. Published RCTs comparing progestogens to placebo or no treatment for maintenance tocolysis were considered. We included women with singleton gestations, excluding quasi-randomized trials, studies on women with preterm premature rupture of membrane, or receiving maintenance tocolysis with other drugs. Primary outcomes were preterm birth (PTB) < 37 weeks' and < 34 weeks'. We assessed risk of bias and evaluated certainty of evidence with the GRADE approach.
resultsSeventeen RCTs including 2152 women with singleton gestations were included. Twelve studies tested vaginal P, five 17-HP, and only 1 oral P. PTB < 34 weeks' did not differ among women receiving vaginal P (RR 1.21, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.61, 1077 participants, moderate certainty of evidence), or oral P (RR 0.89, 95%CI 0.38 to 2.10, 90 participants, low certainty of evidence) as opposed to placebo. Instead, 17-HP significantly reduced the outcome (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.95, 450 participants, moderate certainty of evidence). PTB < 37 weeks' did not differ among women receiving vaginal P (RR 0.95, 95%CI 0.72 to 1.26, 8 studies, 1231 participants, moderate certainty of evidence) or 17-HP (RR 0.86, 95%CI 0.60 to 1.21, 450 participants, low certainty of evidence) when compared to placebo/no treatment. Instead, oral P significantly reduced the outcome (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.93, 90 participants, low certainty of evidence).
conclusionsWith a moderate certainty of evidence, 17-HP prevents PTB < 34 weeks' gestation among women that remained undelivered after an episode of threatened preterm labour. However, data are insufficient to generate recommendations in clinical practice. In the same women, both 17-HP and vaginal P are ineffective in the prevention of PTB < 37 weeks'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.