Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36812167›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

Telemonitoring for perioperative care of outpatient bariatric surgery: Preference-based randomized clinical trial.

E S van Ede, J Scheerhoorn, M P Buise, R A Bouwman, S W Nienhuijs

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06980402 (Pragmatic Pilot Study of SKH@Home Post-discharge Monitoring Initiative on Outcomes of Surgical Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06980402 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pragmatic Pilot Study of SKH@Home Post-discharge Monitoring Initiative on Outcomes of Surgical Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorSengkang General HospitalRan2025 to 2029Enrolled1,000ConditionsLaparoscopy, Discharge PlanningArmsEarly post-surgical discharge with post-surgical home based monitoring, Standard inpatient care until deemed suitable for discharge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E S van EdeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4392-7098
J ScheerhoornDepartment of Surgery, Catharina hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
M P BuiseDepartment of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
R A BouwmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2051-5947
S W NienhuijsDepartment of Surgery, Catharina hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0104-9477

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceImplementation of bariatric surgery on an outpatient basis is hampered by concerns about timely detection of postoperative complications. Telemonitoring could enhance detection and support transition to an outpatient recovery pathway.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate non-inferiority and feasibility of an outpatient recovery pathway after bariatric surgery, supported by remote monitoring compared to standard care.

designPreference-based non-inferiority randomized trial.

settingCenter for obesity and metabolic surgery, Catharina hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

participantsAdult patients scheduled for primary gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy.

interventionsSame-day discharge with one week ongoing Remote Monitoring (RM) of vital parameters or Standard Care (SC) with discharge on postoperative day one. MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary outcome was a thirty-day composite Textbook Outcome score encompassing mortality, mild and severe complications, readmission and prolonged length-of-stay. Non-inferiority of same-day discharge and remote monitoring was accepted below the selected margin of 7% upper limit of confidence interval. Secondary outcomes included admission duration, post-discharge opioid use and patients' satisfaction.

resultsTextbook Outcome was achieved in 94% (n = 102) in RM versus 98% (n = 100) in SC (RR 2.9; 95% CI, 0.60-14.23, p = 0.22). The non-inferiority margin was exceeded which is a statistically inconclusive result. Both Textbook Outcome measures were above Dutch average (5% RM and 9% SC). Same-day discharge reduced hospitalization days by 61% (p<0.001) and by 58% with re-admission days included (p<0.001). Post-discharge opioid use and satisfaction scores were equal (p = 0.82 and p = 0.86).

conclusionIn conclusion, outpatient bariatric surgery supported with telemonitoring is clinically comparable to standard overnight bariatrics in terms of textbook-outcome. Both approaches reached primary endpoint results above Dutch average. However, statistically the outpatient surgery protocol was neither inferior, nor non-inferior to the standard pathway. Additionally, offering same-day discharge reduces the total hospitalization days while maintaining patient satisfaction and safety.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidAdultAftercareAnalgesics, OpioidHumansLength of StayOutpatientsPatient DischargePerioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID36812167
PMCPMC9946229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.