ArticleJournal of integrative bioinformatics2023
Community-wide collaboration is a must to reinstall trust in bioinformatics solutions and biomedical interpretation.
Article in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- BGRS: bioinformatics of genome regulation and data integration.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Science has become a highly competitive undertaking concerning, for example, resources, positions, students, and publications. At the same time, the number of journals presenting scientific findings skyrockets while the knowledge increase per manuscript seems to be diminishing. Science has also become ever more dependent on computational analyses. For example, virtually all biomedical applications involve computational data analysis. The science community develops many computational tools, and there are numerous alternatives for many computational tasks. The same is true for workflow management systems, leading to a tremendous duplication of efforts. Software quality is often of low concern, and typically, a small dataset is used as a proof of principle to support rapid publication. Installation and usage of such tools are complicated, so virtual machine images, containers, and package managers are employed more frequently. These simplify installation and ease of use but do not solve the software quality issue and duplication of effort. We believe that a community-wide collaboration is needed to (a) ensure software quality, (b) increase reuse of code, (c) force proper software review, (c) increase testing, and (d) make interoperability more seamless. Such a science software ecosystem will overcome current issues and increase trust in current data analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.