Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36811902›Full record

Trial reportJAMA psychiatry2023

Clinical Recovery and Long-Term Association of Specialized Early Intervention Services vs Treatment as Usual Among Individuals With First-Episode Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: 20-Year Follow-up of the OPUS Trial.

Helene Gjervig Hansen, Marie Starzer, Sandra Feodor Nilsson, Carsten Hjorthøj, Nikolai Albert, Merete Nordentoft

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00157313 (Randomised Clinical Trial of Integrated Treatment Versus Standard Treatment in First Episode Psychosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00157313 naunknown statusnot on this map

Randomised Clinical Trial of Integrated Treatment Versus Standard Treatment in First Episode Psychosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorBispebjerg HospitalRan1998 to 2022Enrolled600ConditionsPsychotic Disorders, Schizophreniform Disorders, Schizoaffective Disorder, Psychosis, Brief ReactiveArmsIntegrated treatment, family involvement, Social skills training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interventions in schizophrenia should be transdiagnostic, biologically informed, individualized, and disease modifying.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helene Gjervig HansenCopenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marie StarzerCopenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sandra Feodor NilssonCopenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carsten HjorthøjCopenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nikolai AlbertCopenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Merete NordentoftCopenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKMental Health Services · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The OPUS 20-year follow-up is the longest follow-up of a randomized clinical trial testing early intervention services (EIS) among individuals with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Objective: To report on long-term associations of EIS compared with treatment as usual (TAU) for first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 547 individuals were included in this Danish multicenter randomized clinical trial between January 1998 and December 2000 and allocated to early intervention program group (OPUS) or TAU. Raters who were blinded to the original treatment performed the 20-year follow-up. A population-based sample aged 18 to 45 years with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder were included. Individuals were excluded if they were treated with antipsychotics (>12 weeks prior to randomization), had substance-induced psychosis, had mental disability, or had organic mental disorders. Analysis took place between December 2021 and August 2022. Interventions: EIS (OPUS) consisted of 2 years of assertive community treatment including social skill training, psychoeducation, and family involvement by a multidisciplinary team. TAU consisted of the available community mental health treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Psychopathological and functional outcomes, mortality, days of psychiatric hospitalizations, number of psychiatric outpatient contacts, use of supported housing/homeless shelters, symptom remission, and clinical recovery. Results: Of 547 participants, 164 (30%) were interviewed at 20-year follow-up (mean [SD] age, 45.9 [5.6] years; 85 [51.8%] female). No significant differences were found between the OPUS group compared with the TAU group on global functional levels (estimated mean difference, -3.72 [95% CI, -7.67 to 0.22]; P = .06), psychotic symptom dimensions (estimated mean difference, 0.14 [95% CI, -0.25 to 0.52]; P = .48), and negative symptom dimensions (estimated mean difference, 0.13 [95% CI, -0.18 to 0.44]; P = .41). The mortality rate was 13.1% (n = 36) in the OPUS group and 15.1% (n = 41) in the TAU group. Likewise, no differences were found 10 to 20 years after randomization between the OPUS and TAU groups on days of psychiatric hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.73-1.20]; P = .46) or number of outpatient contacts (incidence rate ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.89-1.61]; P = .24). Of the entire sample, 53 participants (40%) were in symptom remission and 23 (18%) were in clinical recovery. Conclusions and Relevance: In this follow-up study of a randomized clinical trial, no differences between 2 years of EIS vs TAU among individuals with diagnosed schizophrenia spectrum disorders at 20 years were found. New initiatives are needed to maintain the positive outcomes achieved after 2 years of EIS and furthermore improve very long-term outcomes. While registry data was without attrition, interpretation of clinical assessments are limited by high attrition rate. However, this attrition bias most likely confirms the lack of an observed long-term association of OPUS with outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00157313.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36811902
PMCPMC9947803
OpenAlexW4321491248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.