Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36811778›Full record

ReviewInflammopharmacology2023

The wound healing effect of botanicals and pure natural substances used in in vivo models.

S A El-Sherbeni, W A Negm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Inflammopharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A critical overview of challenging roles of medicinal plants in improvement of wound healing technology.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Wound-Healing Efficacy ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mixture Containing 5% Polysaccharide Extract ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S A El-SherbeniDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta, 31527, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9031-0149
W A NegmDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta, 31527, Egypt. walaa.negm@pharm.tanta.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0463-8047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repairing the wound is a multistep process that includes the spatial and temporal synchronization of a different range of cell types to increase the speed of wound contraction, the proliferation of epithelial cells, and collagen formation. The need for proper management of acute wounds to be cured and not turned into chronic wounds is a significant clinical challenge. The traditional practice of medicinal plants in many regions of the world has been used in wound healing since ancient times. Recent scientific research introduced evidence of the efficacy of medicinal plants, their phyto-components, and the mechanisms underlying their wound-repairing activity. This review aims to briefly highlight the wound-curing effect of different plant extracts and purely natural substances in excision, incision, and burn experimental animal models with or without infection of mice, rats (diabetic and nondiabetic), and rabbits in the last 5 years. The in vivo studies represented reliable evidence of how powerful natural products are in healing wounds properly. They have good scavenging activity against Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects that help in the process of wound healing. It is evident that incorporating bioactive natural products into wound dressings of bio- or synthetic polymers in nanofiber, hydrogel, film, scaffold, and sponge forms showed promising results in different phases of the wound-curing process of haemostasis, inflammation, growth, re-epithelialization, and remodelling.

Indexed as

BurnsPlants, MedicinalAnimalsMicePlant ExtractsRabbitsRatsSkinWound HealingPlant ExtractsAnimal modelsBurnsInflammationNatural productsWound dressingsWound healing

Identifiers

PMID36811778
PMCPMC10140094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.