Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36811769›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023

Heat-resistant and biofilm-forming Escherichia coli in pasteurized milk from Brazil.

Maxsueli Aparecida Moura Machado, Vinicius Silva Castro, Adelino da Cunha-Neto, Deyse Christina Vallim, Rodrigo de Castro Lisbôa Pereira, Jaqueline Oliveira Dos Reis, Patrícia Veiga de Almeida, Diego Galvan, Carlos Adam Conte-Junior, Eduardo Eustáquio de Souza Figueiredo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maxsueli Aparecida Moura MachadoGraduate Program in Food Science, Chemistry Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0189-9017
Vinicius Silva CastroDepartment of Biological Science, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4746-0237
Adelino da Cunha-NetoDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Federal University of Mato Grosso - Campus Cuiabá, Fernando Correa da Costa. Avenue, Boa Esperança, Mato Grosso, 78060-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4365-9502
Deyse Christina VallimOswaldo Cruz Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8678-6021
Rodrigo de Castro Lisbôa PereiraOswaldo Cruz Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-573X
Jaqueline Oliveira Dos ReisGraduate Program in Animal Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9089-7063
Patrícia Veiga de AlmeidaGraduate in Animal Bioscience, University of Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8750-8277
Diego GalvanCenter for Food Analysis (NAL), Technological Development Support Laboratory (LADETEC), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8394-3431
Carlos Adam Conte-JuniorGraduate Program in Food Science, Chemistry Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6133-5080
Eduardo Eustáquio de Souza FigueiredoDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Federal University of Mato Grosso - Campus Cuiabá, Fernando Correa da Costa. Avenue, Boa Esperança, Mato Grosso, 78060-900, Brazil. figueiredoeduardo@ufmt.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2608-4324
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade de Cuiabá · BRUniversity of Lethbridge · CA

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 200472/2022-4Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 310181/2021-6Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 313119/2020-1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 444465/2020-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli harboring a transmissible locus of stress tolerance (tLST) and the ability to form biofilms represent a serious risk in dairy production. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the microbiological quality of pasteurized milk from two dairy producers in Mato Grosso, Brazil, with a focus on determining the possible presence of E. coli with heat resistance (60 °C/6 min), biofilm-forming potential phenotypes and genotypes, and antimicrobial susceptibility. For this, fifty pasteurized milk samples from producers named A and B were obtained for 5 weeks to investigate the presence of Enterobacteriaceae members, coliforms, and E. coli. For heat resistance, E. coli isolates were exposed to a water bath at 60 °C for 0 and 6 min. In antibiogram analysis, eight antibiotics belonging to six antimicrobial classes were analyzed. The potential to form biofilms was quantified at 570 nm, and curli expression by Congo Red was analyzed. To determine the genotypic profile, we performed PCR for the tLST and rpoS genes, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to investigate the clonal profile of the isolates. Thus, producer A presented unsatisfactory microbiological conditions regarding Enterobacteriaceae and coliforms for weeks 4 and 5, while all samples analyzed for producer B were contaminated at above-the-limit levels established by national and international legislation. These unsatisfactory conditions enabled us to isolate 31 E. coli from both producers (7 isolates from producer A and 24 isolates from producer B). In this way, 6 E. coli isolates (5 from producer A and 1 from producer B) were highly heat resistant. However, although only 6 E. coli showed a highly heat-resistant profile, 97% (30/31) of all E. coli were tLST-positive. In contrast, all isolates were sensitive to all antimicrobials tested. In addition, moderate or weak biofilm potential was verified in 51.6% (16/31), and the expression of curli and presence of rpoS was not always related to this biofilm potential. Therefore, the results emphasize the spreading of heat-resistant E. coli with tLST in both producers and indicate the biofilm as a possible source of contamination during milk pasteurization. However, the possibility of E. coli producing biofilm and surviving pasteurization temperatures cannot be ruled out, and this should be investigated.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliMilkAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsBrazilEnterobacteriaceaeHot TemperatureAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial susceptiblyHeat treatmentLocus of heat resistanceRposTransmissible locus of stress tolerance

Identifiers

PMID36811769
PMCPMC10235242
OpenAlexW4321479827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.