Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36811767›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023

Resistance profile and biofilm production of Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus sp., and Streptococcus spp. from dairy farms in southern Brazil.

P R Santos, R B Kraus, S L Ladeira, G M Pereira, K F Cunha, K E Palhares, A C A Silva, G C Dors, H G Lima, N D Cereser and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P R SantosDepartament of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, 96010-900, Brazil. rassier1907@gmail.com.
R B KrausDepartament of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, 96010-900, Brazil.
S L LadeiraRegional Laboratory of Diagnostics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, 96010-900, Brazil.
G M PereiraDepartament of Mathematics and Statistics, Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, 96010-900, Brazil.
K F CunhaDepartament of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, 96010-900, Brazil.
K E PalharesDepartament of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, 96010-900, Brazil.
A C A SilvaCampus Xapuri, Federal Institute of Acre, Xapuri, 78900-000, Brazil.
G C DorsDepartament of Agribusiness Science and Technology, Eliseu Maciel College of Agronomy, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, 96010-900, Brazil.
H G LimaDepartament of Preventive Veterinary, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, 96010-900, Brazil.
N D CereserDepartament of Preventive Veterinary, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, 96010-900, Brazil.
P S NascenteDepartament of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, 96010-900, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRInstituto Federal do Acre · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Milk is a high nutritional value food that helps in human development and growth. However, it can also harbor microorganisms. Therefore, the objective of this study was to isolate, identify and evaluate the resistance profile and pathogenicity factors of gram-positive cocci isolated from liners in milking rooms in the south of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Biochemical and molecular tests were performed for the identification. The following were isolated: Enterococcus faecalis (10), Enterococcus faecium (4), Staphylococcus intermedius (1), Streptococcus uberis (1), and Streptococcus dysgalactiae (1). The susceptibility of isolated microorganisms to eight antibiotics was evaluated according to CLSI, and the genus that proved to be resistant to most of those was Enterococcus. In addition, all 17 isolates were able to form biofilm, which remained viable after the use of neutral, alkaline and alkaline-chlorinated detergent. The only product that was effective against biofilm of all microorganisms was chlorhexidine 2%. The results obtained highlight the importance of pre- and post-dipping tests on dairy properties, in which chlorhexidine is one of the disinfectants used. As observed, products indicated for cleaning and descaling pipes were not effective on biofilms of the different species tested.

Indexed as

Mastitis, BovineStaphylococcal InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsBrazilCattleChlorhexidineEnterococcusFarmsFemaleHumansMilkStaphylococcusStreptococcusAnti-Bacterial AgentsChlorhexidineDairy productionFood contaminationMastitis

Identifiers

PMID36811767
PMCPMC10235326
OpenAlexW4321483233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.