ArticleDrugs in R&D2023
Development of the Drug Product Formulation of the Bevacizumab Biosimilar PF-06439535 (Bevacizumab-bvzr).
Article in Drugs in R&D, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of Analytical Method for the Quantitation of Monoclonal Antibodies Solutions via Raman Spectroscopy: The Case of Bevacizumab.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPF-06439535 (bevacizumab-bvzr; Zirabev
methodsPF-06439535 was formulated in several buffers and stored for 12 weeks at 40 °C to determine the optimal buffer and pH under stressed conditions. Subsequently, PF-06439535 at 100 and 25 mg/mL was formulated in a succinate buffer with sucrose, edetate disodium dihydrate (EDTA), and polysorbate 80, and in the RP formulation. Samples were stored at - 40 °C to 40 °C for ≤ 22 weeks. The physicochemical and biological properties relevant to the safety, efficacy, quality, or manufacturability were investigated.
resultsWhen stored at 40 °C for 13 days, PF-06439535 demonstrated optimal stability in histidine or succinate buffers and was more stable in the succinate formulation than the RP formulation, under both real-time and accelerated stability conditions. There were no significant changes in the quality attributes of 100 mg/mL PF-06439535 after storage at - 20 °C and - 40 °C for 22 weeks, and there were no changes in the quality attributes of 25 mg/mL PF-06439535 after storage at 5 °C (recommended storage temperature). Changes were observed at 25 °C for 22 weeks or at 40 °C for 8 weeks as expected. No new degraded species were observed in the biosimilar succinate formulation compared with the RP formulation.
conclusionsResults demonstrated that 20 mM succinate buffer (pH 5.5) is the PF-06439535 preferred formulation, and that sucrose is an effective cryoprotectant for processing and frozen storage, and an effective stabilizing excipient for 5 °C liquid storage of PF-06439535.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.