ArticleExperimental brain research2023
Covariation of the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in a resting hand muscle.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute and post-acute neurobehavioral responses to lysergic acid diethylamide in healthy subjects: a randomized controlled study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of a novel elbow joint torque measurement device in healthy subjects and stroke patients: a randomized trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Temporal dynamics of ipsilateral corticospinal excitability during the motor learning process of a complex manual task.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Very low-amplitude muscle activity increases probability of motor evoked potentials in healthy individuals and in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- A method of compensating for the excitability of spinal motoneurones when estimating the magnitude of potentials evoked in skeletal muscles.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Correlated amplitudes of potentials evoked in homologous muscles by magnetic stimulation reveal positive covariation of corticospinal output.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Height-dependent variation in corticospinal excitability modulation after active but not sham intermittent theta burst stimulation.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Article
- Predictable transcranial magnetic stimulation suppresses corticospinal excitability: a TMS experiment.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Analysis of Neuronal Excitability Profiles for Motor-Eloquent Brain Tumor Entities Using nTMS in 800 Patients.Cancers · 2025Article
- Article
- Transcutaneous cervical vagus nerve stimulation improved motor cortex excitability in healthy adults: a randomized, single-blind, self-crossover design study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique used to study human neurophysiology. A single TMS pulse delivered to the primary motor cortex can elicit a motor evoked potential (MEP) in a target muscle. MEP amplitude is a measure of corticospinal excitability and MEP latency is a measure of the time taken for intracortical processing, corticofugal conduction, spinal processing, and neuromuscular transmission. Although MEP amplitude is known to vary across trials with constant stimulus intensity, little is known about MEP latency variation. To investigate MEP amplitude and latency variation at the individual level, we scored single-pulse MEP amplitude and latency in a resting hand muscle from two datasets. MEP latency varied from trial to trial in individual participants with a median range of 3.9 ms. Shorter MEP latencies were associated with larger MEP amplitudes for most individuals (median r = - 0.47), showing that latency and amplitude are jointly determined by the excitability of the corticospinal system when TMS is delivered. TMS delivered during heightened excitability could discharge a greater number of cortico-cortical and corticospinal cells, increasing the amplitude and, by recurrent activation of corticospinal cells, the number of descending indirect waves. An increase in the amplitude and number of indirect waves would progressively recruit larger spinal motor neurons with large-diameter fast-conducting fibers, which would shorten MEP onset latency and increase MEP amplitude. In addition to MEP amplitude variability, understanding MEP latency variability is important given that these parameters are used to help characterize pathophysiology of movement disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.