Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36811654›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Factors influencing successful reconstruction of tympanic membrane perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kata Illés, Dorottya Gergő, Zsuzsanna Keresztély, Fanni Dembrovszky, Péter Fehérvári, András Bánvölgyi, Dezső Csupor, Péter Hegyi, Tamás Horváth

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of Multiple Interventions for Moderate to Large Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Factor-based reperforation timing after tympanoplasty: a graft survival analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. [Risk factors of wet ear and its impact on surgical outcomes of endoscopic type Ⅰ tympanoplasty].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predictors of Surgical Success and Hearing Outcomes in Endoscopic Cartilage Tympanoplasty: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kata IllésCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary. illes.kata@bajcsy.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2939-060X
Dorottya GergőCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna KeresztélyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Hospital, Maglódi út 89-91, Budapest, 1106, Hungary.
Fanni DembrovszkyCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Péter FehérváriCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
András BánvölgyiCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Dezső CsuporCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Péter HegyiCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Tamás HorváthCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary. horvath.tamas@bajcsy.hu.
Semmelweis University · HUBajcsy-Zsilinszky Kórház és Rendelőintézet · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBased on a systematic review and meta-analysis, our study aimed to provide information about the factors that influence the success of tympanic membrane reconstruction.

methodsOur systematic search was conducted on November 24, 2021, using the CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE databases. Observational studies with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up on type I tympanoplasty or myringoplasty were included, while non-English articles, patients with cholesteatoma or specific inflammatory diseases, and ossiculoplasty cases were excluded. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021289240) and PRISMA reporting guideline was used. Risk of bias was evaluated with the QUIPS tool. A random effect model was used in the analyses. Primary outcome was the rate of closed tympanic cavities.

resultsAfter duplicate removal, 9454 articles were found, of which 39 cohort studies were included. Results of four analyses showed significant effects: age (OR: 0.62, CI 0.50; 0.78, p value: 0.0002), size of the perforation (OR: 0.52, CI 0.29; 0.94, p value: 0.033), opposite ear condition (OR: 0.32, CI 0.12; 0.85, p value: 0.028), and the surgeon's experience (OR: 0.42, CI 0.26; 0.67, p value: 0.005), while prior adenoid surgery, smoking, the site of the perforation, and discharge of the ear did not. Four factors: etiology, Eustachian tube function, concomitant allergic rhinitis, and duration of the ear discharge were analyzed qualitatively.

conclusionsThe age of the patient, the size of the perforation, the opposite ear status, and the surgeon's experience have a significant effect on the success of tympanic membrane reconstruction. Further comprehensive studies are needed to analyze the interactions between the factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Tympanic Membrane PerforationHumansMyringoplastyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTympanic MembraneTympanoplastyMyringoplastyPredictionPredictive factorsType-I tympanoplasty

Identifiers

PMID36811654
PMCPMC10175362
OpenAlexW4321482540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.