Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36811641›Full record

ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Minimally invasive catheters in varicose vein treatment : New gold standard?]

Kornelia Böhler

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kornelia BöhlerMedical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich. kornelia.boehler@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndovenous procedures are commonly used for varicose vein treatment.

objectivesTypes, functionality, and significance of endovenous devices.

methodsTo describe the different endovenous devices, their mode of action, inherent risks and efficacy according to the literature.

resultsLong-term data confirm that endovenous procedures are equally effective as open surgery. Postoperative pain is minimal and downtime shorter after catheter interventions.

conclusionCatheter-based endovenous procedures increase the diversity of varicose vein treatment options. They are preferred by patients due to less pain and shorter downtime.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationLaser TherapyVaricose VeinsCathetersHumansPostoperative PainSaphenous VeinCyanoacrylate glueLaser ablationMechanical-chemical ablationRadiofrequency ablationVaricose vein

Identifiers

PMID36811641
PMCPMC9981706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.