Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36811588›Full record

ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2023

Donor human milk processing and its impact on infant digestion: A systematic scoping review of in vitro and in vivo studies.

Michael A Pitino, Megan R Beggs, Deborah L O'Connor, Alain Doyen, Yves Pouliot, Mélanie Sergius-Ronot, Sharon Unger

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Balancing access to donor human milk: Rationing vs expanding use.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Comparative inactivation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. A Framework for Evaluation of New Processing Technologies in Human Milk Banking.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael A PitinoTranslational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Megan R BeggsTranslational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Deborah L O'ConnorTranslational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Rogers Hixon Ontario Human Milk Bank, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alain DoyenUniversité Laval, Département des Sciences des Aliments, Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF) Québec, Québec, Canada.
Yves PouliotUniversité Laval, Département des Sciences des Aliments, Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF) Québec, Québec, Canada.
Mélanie Sergius-RonotUniversité Laval, Département des Sciences des Aliments, Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF) Québec, Québec, Canada.
Sharon UngerDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Rogers Hixon Ontario Human Milk Bank, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: sharon.unger@sinaihealth.ca.
University of Toronto · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When there is an inadequate supply of mother's milk, pasteurized donor human milk is preferred over formula to supplement feeds for preterm infants. Although providing donor milk helps to improve feeding tolerance and reduce necrotizing enterocolitis, changes to its composition and reductions in bioactivity during processing, are thought to contribute to the slower growth often exhibited by these infants. To improve the clinical outcomes of recipient infants by maximizing the quality of donor milk, research is currently investigating strategies to optimize all aspects of processing, including pooling, pasteurization, and freezing; however, reviews of this literature typically only summarize the impact of a processing technique on composition or bioactivity. Reviews of published research investigating the impact of donor milk processing on infant digestion/absorption are lacking and thus, was the objective for this systematic scoping review, Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PJTMW). Databases were searched for primary research studies evaluating donor milk processing for pathogen inactivation or other rationale and subsequent effect on infant digestion/absorption. Non-human milk studies or those assessing other outcomes were excluded. Overall, 24 articles from 12,985 records screened were included. Most studied thermal methods to inactivate pathogens, predominantly Holder pasteurization (HoP) (62.5°C, 30 min) and high-temperature short-time. Heating consistently decreased lipolysis and increased proteolysis of lactoferrin and caseins; however, protein hydrolysis was unaffected from in vitro studies. The abundance and diversity of released peptides remain unclear and should be further explored. Greater investigation into less-harsh methods for pasteurization, such as high-pressure processing, is warranted. Only 1 study assessed the impact of this technique and found minimal impact on digestion outcomes compared with HoP. Fat homogenization appeared to positively impact fat digestion (n = 3 studies), and only 1 eligible study investigated freeze-thawing. Identified knowledge gaps regarding optimal methods of processing should be further explored to improve the quality and nutrition of donor milk.

Indexed as

Infant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, PrematureDigestionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMilk, HumanNutritional Statusdigestiondonor human milkinfantmilk bankingprocessingsimulated digestion

Identifiers

PMID36811588
PMCPMC10102984
OpenAlexW4312222453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.