Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36811522›Full record

ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2023

Effects of perceived vs actual frequency of rewards on orthodontic patient attitudes and compliance.

Alan Yee, Wendy Chu, Pramod Sinha, Amir Mohajeri, Man Hung, Donna Kritz-Silverstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alan Yee
Wendy Chu
Pramod Sinha
Amir Mohajeri
Man Hung
Donna Kritz-Silverstein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the longitudinal association of different reward schedules on patient compliance (as measured by oral hygiene assessments). The cross-sectional associations of actual vs perceived rewards frequency on patient attitudes were also examined. MATERIALS AND

methods138 patients undergoing treatment at a university orthodontic clinic were surveyed to collect information on perceived frequency of rewards, likelihood of making patient referrals, and attitudes toward reward programs and orthodontic treatment. Oral hygiene assessment from the most recent appointment and actual frequency of rewards were obtained from patient charts.

resultsAmong participants, 44.9% were male, age ranged from 11 to 18 (mean = 14.9 ± 1.7) years; treatment time ranged from 9 to 56 (mean = 23.2 ± 9.8) months. Mean perceived frequency of rewards was 48% while actual frequency of rewards was 19.6%. There were no significant differences in attitudes by actual reward frequency (P > .10). However, those who perceived always receiving rewards were significantly more likely to have more positive opinions of reward programs (P = .004 and P = .024). Age- and treatment-time adjusted analyses showed that always receiving actual rewards was associated with odds of good oral hygiene 3.8 times (95% CI = 1.13, 13.09) higher than those never/rarely receiving actual rewards, but there was no association between perceived rewards and odds of good oral hygiene. Actual and perceived reward frequencies were significantly and positively correlated (r = 0.40, P < .001).

conclusionsIt is beneficial to give rewards to patients as often as possible to maximize compliance (as shown by hygiene ratings) and foster positive attitudes.

Indexed as

Oral HygienePatient ComplianceAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRewardSurveys and QuestionnairesComplianceOrthodonticRewards

Identifiers

PMID36811522
PMCPMC10294581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.