Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36811359›Full record

ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2023

An optimized transformation protocol for Anthoceros agrestis and three more hornwort species.

Manuel Waller, Eftychios Frangedakis, Alan O Marron, Susanna Sauret-Güeto, Jenna Rever, Cyrus Raja Rubenstein Sabbagh, Julian M Hibberd, Jim Haseloff, Karen S Renzaglia, Péter Szövényi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Callose in leptoid cell walls of the mossFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  8. What can hornworts teach us?Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Manuel Waller *Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6060-0740
Eftychios Frangedakis *Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3483-8464
Alan O MarronDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2606-5641
Susanna Sauret-GüetoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3792-8278
Jenna ReverDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.
Cyrus Raja Rubenstein SabbaghDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3866-8332
Julian M HibberdDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0662-7958
Jim HaseloffDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4793-8058
Karen S RenzagliaDepartment of Plant Biology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, 62901, USA.
Péter SzövényiDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0324-4639

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L014130/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land plants comprise two large monophyletic lineages, the vascular plants and the bryophytes, which diverged from their most recent common ancestor approximately 480 million years ago. Of the three lineages of bryophytes, only the mosses and the liverworts are systematically investigated, while the hornworts are understudied. Despite their importance for understanding fundamental questions of land plant evolution, they only recently became amenable to experimental investigation, with Anthoceros agrestis being developed as a hornwort model system. Availability of a high-quality genome assembly and a recently developed genetic transformation technique makes A. agrestis an attractive model species for hornworts. Here we describe an updated and optimized transformation protocol for A. agrestis, which can be successfully used to genetically modify one more strain of A. agrestis and three more hornwort species, Anthoceros punctatus, Leiosporoceros dussii, and Phaeoceros carolinianus. The new transformation method is less laborious, faster, and results in the generation of greatly increased numbers of transformants compared with the previous method. We have also developed a new selection marker for transformation. Finally, we report the development of a set of different cellular localization signal peptides for hornworts providing new tools to better understand the hornwort cell biology.

Indexed as

AnthocerotophytaBryophytaEmbryophytaPhylogenySeedsAgrobacterium-mediated transformationconstitutive promoterhornwortsland plant evolutionsubcellular targeting

Identifiers

PMID36811359
PMCPMC10952725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.