ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2023
An augmented Snake Optimizer for diseases and COVID-19 diagnosis.
Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Snake Optimization Algorithm Augmented by AdaptiveBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multi-task snake optimization algorithm for global optimization and planar kinematic arm control problem.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Ameliorated Snake Optimizer-Based Approximate Merging of Disk Wang-Ball Curves.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Snake-Efficient Feature Selection-Based Framework for Precise Early Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Challenges and Limitation Analysis of an IoT-Dependent System for Deployment in Smart Healthcare Using Communication Standards Features.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Integrative soft computing approaches for optimizing thermal energy performance in residential buildings.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feature Selection (FS) techniques extract the most recognizable features for improving the performance of classification methods for medical applications. In this paper, two intelligent wrapper FS approaches based on a new metaheuristic algorithm named the Snake Optimizer (SO) are introduced. The binary SO, called BSO, is built based on an S-shape transform function to handle the binary discrete values in the FS domain. To improve the exploration of the search space by BSO, three evolutionary crossover operators (i.e., one-point crossover, two-point crossover, and uniform crossover) are incorporated and controlled by a switch probability. The two newly developed FS algorithms, BSO and BSO-CV, are implemented and assessed on a real-world COVID-19 dataset and 23 disease benchmark datasets. According to the experimental results, the improved BSO-CV significantly outperformed the standard BSO in terms of accuracy and running time in 17 datasets. Furthermore, it shrinks the COVID-19 dataset's dimension by 89% as opposed to the BSO's 79%. Moreover, the adopted operator on BSO-CV improved the balance between exploitation and exploration capabilities in the standard BSO, particularly in searching and converging toward optimal solutions. The BSO-CV was compared against the most recent wrapper-based FS methods; namely, the hyperlearning binary dragonfly algorithm (HLBDA), the binary moth flame optimization with Lévy flight (LBMFO-V3), the coronavirus herd immunity optimizer with greedy crossover operator (CHIO-GC), as well as four filter methods with an accuracy of more than 90% in most benchmark datasets. These optimistic results reveal the great potential of BSO-CV in reliably searching the feature space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.