Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36810943›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of experimental biology2023

Modern three-dimensional digital methods for studying locomotor biomechanics in tetrapods.

Oliver E Demuth, Eva Herbst, Delyle T Polet, Ashleigh L A Wiseman, John R Hutchinson

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of experimental biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Soft tissue constraints on joint mobility in the avian shoulder.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oliver E DemuthDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4876-1311
Eva HerbstPalaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3640-9695
Delyle T PoletStructure and Motion Laboratory, Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8299-3434
Ashleigh L A WisemanMcDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3ER, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9575-4387
John R HutchinsonStructure and Motion Laboratory, Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-7038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we review the modern interface of three-dimensional (3D) empirical (e.g. motion capture) and theoretical (e.g. modelling and simulation) approaches to the study of terrestrial locomotion using appendages in tetrapod vertebrates. These tools span a spectrum from more empirical approaches such as XROMM, to potentially more intermediate approaches such as finite element analysis, to more theoretical approaches such as dynamic musculoskeletal simulations or conceptual models. These methods have much in common beyond the importance of 3D digital technologies, and are powerfully synergistic when integrated, opening a wide range of hypotheses that can be tested. We discuss the pitfalls and challenges of these 3D methods, leading to consideration of the problems and potential in their current and future usage. The tools (hardware and software) and approaches (e.g. methods for using hardware and software) in the 3D analysis of tetrapod locomotion have matured to the point where now we can use this integration to answer questions we could never have tackled 20 years ago, and apply insights gleaned from them to other fields.

Indexed as

LocomotionVertebratesAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationSoftwareAnimationBoneDynamicsGaitMuscleOptimization

Identifiers

PMID36810943
PMCPMC10042237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read13
reference markers read36
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.