Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36810917›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2023

Delivering on the promise of protein degraders.

Matthew N O'Brien Laramy, Suman Luthra, Matthew F Brown, Derek W Bartlett

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Targeted degradation of c-Myc through the midnolin-proteasome pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Property-based optimisation of PROTACs.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  19. A Kinetic Scout Approach Accelerates Targeted Protein Degrader Development.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew N O'Brien LaramySmall Molecule Pharmaceutical Sciences, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA. obrienlm@gene.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1721-0464
Suman LuthraDiscovery Pharmaceutical Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Matthew F BrownDiscovery Sciences, Worldwide Research, Development, and Medical, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2496-9089
Derek W BartlettPharmacokinetics, Dynamics, & Metabolism, Worldwide Research, Development, and Medical, Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-9069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 3 years, the first bivalent protein degraders intentionally designed for targeted protein degradation (TPD) have advanced to clinical trials, with an initial focus on established targets. Most of these clinical candidates are designed for oral administration, and many discovery efforts appear to be similarly focused. As we look towards the future, we propose that an oral-centric discovery paradigm will overly constrain the chemical designs that are considered and limit the potential to drug novel targets. In this Perspective, we summarize the current state of the bivalent degrader modality and propose three categories of degrader designs, based on their likely route of administration and requirement for drug delivery technologies. We then describe a vision for how parenteral drug delivery, implemented early in research and supported by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling, can enable exploration of a broader drug design space, expand the scope of accessible targets and deliver on the promise of protein degraders as a therapeutic modality.

Indexed as

Drug DesignProteinsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansProteolysisProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.