Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36810868›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A hyperaldosteronism subtypes predictive model using ensemble learning.

Shigehiro Karashima, Masaki Kawakami, Hidetaka Nambo, Mitsuhiro Kometani, Isao Kurihara, Takamasa Ichijo, Takuyuki Katabami, Mika Tsuiki, Norio Wada, Kenji Oki and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Shigehiro Karashima *Institute of Liberal Arts and Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Masaki Kawakami *School of Electrical Information Communication Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Hidetaka NamboSchool of Electrical Information Communication Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Mitsuhiro KometaniDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan.
Isao KuriharaDepartment of Medical Education, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Takamasa IchijoDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Takuyuki KatabamiDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University Yokohama City Seibu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Mika TsuikiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Norio WadaDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Kenji OkiDepartment of Molecular and Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yoshihiro OgawaDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ryuji OkamotoDepartment of Cardiology and Nephrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.
Kouichi TamuraDepartment of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Nobuya InagakiDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Nutrition, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takanobu YoshimotoDepartment of Molecular Endocrinology and Metabolism, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki KobayashiDivision of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Endocrinology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Miki KakutaniDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Megumi FujitaDivision of Nephrology and Endocrinology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoichiro IzawaDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Tetsuya SuwaDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Kohei KamemuraDepartment of Cardiology, Shinko Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Masanobu YamadaDepartment of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan.
Akiyo TanabeDivision of Endocrinology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuhide NaruseEndocrine Center, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Takashi YonedaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan. endocrin@med.kanazawa-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-0921-158X
JPAS/JRAS Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a machine-learning algorithm to diagnose aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) for predicting APA probabilities. A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the Japan Rare/Intractable Adrenal Diseases Study dataset was performed using the nationwide PA registry in Japan comprised of 41 centers. Patients treated between January 2006 and December 2019 were included. Forty-six features at screening and 13 features at confirmatory test were used for model development to calculate APA probability. Seven machine-learning programs were combined to develop the ensemble-learning model (ELM), which was externally validated. The strongest predictive factors for APA were serum potassium (s-K) at first visit, s-K after medication, plasma aldosterone concentration, aldosterone-to-renin ratio, and potassium supplementation dose. The average performance of the screening model had an AUC of 0.899; the confirmatory test model had an AUC of 0.913. In the external validation, the AUC was 0.964 in the screening model using an APA probability of 0.17. The clinical findings at screening predicted the diagnosis of APA with high accuracy. This novel algorithm can support the PA practice in primary care settings and prevent potentially curable APA patients from falling outside the PA diagnostic flowchart.

Indexed as

AdenomaHyperaldosteronismHypertensionAldosteroneCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPotassiumReninRetrospective StudiesAldosteronePotassiumRenin

Identifiers

PMID36810868
PMCPMC9943838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.