Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36810798›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023

Cartilage repair strategies in the knee according to Dutch Orthopedic Surgeons: a survey study.

R M Jeuken, P P W van Hugten, A K Roth, T A E J Boymans, J Caron, A Weber, R J H Custers, P J Emans

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

R M JeukenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Preservation Clinic, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. r.jeuken@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7729-8800
P P W van HugtenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Preservation Clinic, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
A K RothDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Preservation Clinic, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
T A E J BoymansDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Preservation Clinic, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J CaronDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, St Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
A WeberDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Preservation Clinic, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
R J H CustersDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
P J EmansDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Preservation Clinic, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study surveyed Dutch orthopedic surgeons on the management of cartilage defects in the knee and the adherence to the recently updated Dutch knee cartilage repair consensus statement (DCS).

methodsA web-based survey was sent to 192 Dutch knee specialists.

resultsThe response rate was 60%. Microfracture, debridement and osteochondral autografts are performed by the majority, 93%, 70% and 27% of respondents, respectively. Complex techniques are used by < 7%. Microfracture is mainly considered in defects 1-2 cm

conclusionSmall cartilage defects in ideal patients may be well treated by general orthopedic surgeons. The matter becomes complicated in older patients, or in case of larger defects or malalignment. The current study reveals some knowledge gaps for these more complex patients. Referral to tertiary centers might be indicated, as is stated by the DCS, and this centralization should enhance knee joint preservation. Since the data from present study are subjective, registration of all separate cartilage repair cases should fuel objective analysis of clinical practice and adherence to the DCS in the future.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesFractures, StressOrthopedic ProceduresOrthopedic SurgeonsAgedChondrocytesHumansKnee JointMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTransplantation, AutologousCartilageDutchKneeRepairSurvey

Identifiers

PMID36810798
PMCPMC10374775
OpenAlexW4321434845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.