Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36810797›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2023

Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of patients with oesophagogastric cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: national study.

Mark A Baxter, Khurram S Khan, Lewis S Gall, Catherine Samuelson, Catherine McCollum, Rongkagorn Chuntamongkol, Lakshmi R Narramneni, Manaf Al-Zuabi, Gavin Bryce, Hala E J Shareef and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF GASTRIC CANCER: A 3-YEAR ANALYSIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mark A BaxterDivision of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5773-8650
Khurram S KhanDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital Hairmyres, East Kilbride, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8304-5970
Lewis S GallDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Catherine SamuelsonDepartment of Oncology, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Edinburgh, UK.
Catherine McCollumDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Rongkagorn ChuntamongkolDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Lakshmi R NarramneniDepartment of Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.
Manaf Al-ZuabiDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital Wishaw, Wishaw, UK.
Gavin BryceDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital Wishaw, Wishaw, UK.
Hala E J ShareefTayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.
Matthew ForshawSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Russell D PettyDivision of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe national response to COVID-19 has had a significant impact on cancer services. This study investigated the effect of national lockdown on diagnosis, management, and outcomes of patients with oesophagogastric cancers in Scotland.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included consecutive new patients presenting to regional oesophagogastric cancer multidisciplinary teams in National Health Service Scotland between October 2019 and September 2020. The study interval was divided into before and after lockdown, based on the first UK national lockdown. Electronic health records were reviewed and results compared.

resultsSome 958 patients with biopsy-proven oesophagogastric cancer in 3 cancer networks were included: 506 (52.8 per cent) before and 452 (47.2 per cent) after lockdown. Median age was 72 (range 25-95) years and 630 patients (65.7 per cent) were men. There were 693 oesophageal (72.3 per cent) and 265 gastric (27.7 per cent) cancers. Median time to gastroscopy was 15 (range 0-337) days before versus 19 (0-261) days after lockdown (P < 0.001). Patients were more likely to present as an emergency after lockdown (8.5 per cent before versus 12.4 per cent after lockdown; P = 0.005), had poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology group performance status, were more symptomatic, and presented with a higher stage of disease (stage IV: 49.8 per cent before versus 58.8 per cent after lockdown; P = 0.04). There was a shift to treatment with non-curative intent (64.6 per cent before versus 77.4 per cent after lockdown; P < 0.001). Median overall survival was 9.9 (95 per cent c.i. 8.7 to 11.4) months before and 6.9 (5.9 to 8.3) months after lockdown (HR 1.26, 95 per cent c.i. 1.09 to 1.46; P = 0.002).

conclusionThis national study has highlighted the adverse impact of COVID-19 on oesophagogastric cancer outcomes in Scotland. Patients presented with more advanced disease and a shift towards treatment with non-curative intent was observed, with a subsequent negative impact on overall survival.

Indexed as

COVID-19Esophageal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19 TestingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRetrospective StudiesState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID36810797
PMCPMC10364509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.