Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36810503›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2023

Association of Strength Performance in Bench Press and Squat with Anthropometric Variables between Resistance-Trained Males and Females.

Hallvard Nygaard Falch, Markus Estifanos Haugen, Stian Larsen, Roland van den Tillaar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association of Physical and Emotional Parameters with Performance of Firefighters: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hallvard Nygaard FalchDepartment of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, Nord University, 7600 Levanger, Norway.
Markus Estifanos HaugenDepartment of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, Nord University, 7600 Levanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0797-664X
Stian LarsenDepartment of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, Nord University, 7600 Levanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5254-1747
Roland van den TillaarDepartment of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, Nord University, 7600 Levanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4481-4490
Nord University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in the appropriate percentage of 1-RM for a given repetition range could be a result of variation in anthropometrics and/or sex. Strength endurance is the term used to describe the ability to perform a number of repetitions prior to failure (AMRAP) in sub-maximal lifts and is important in determining the appropriate load for the targeted repetition range. Earlier research investigating the association of AMRAP performance and anthropometric variables was often performed in a sample of pooled sexes or one sex only or by utilizing tests with low ecological validity. As such, this randomized cross-over study investigates the association of anthropometrics with different measures of strength (maximal and relative strength and AMRAP) in the squat and bench press for resistance-trained males (

Indexed as

1-RM performancesexstrength training

Identifiers

PMID36810503
PMCPMC9944492
OpenAlexW4318829678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.