Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36810418›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Effect of in vitro cultivation on human gut microbiota composition using 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing and metabolomics approach.

Paulina Średnicka, Marek Łukasz Roszko, Dominik Popowski, Monika Kowalczyk, Michał Wójcicki, Paulina Emanowicz, Magdalena Szczepańska, Danuta Kotyrba, Edyta Juszczuk-Kubiak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Isolation and characterization of lyticFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The living medicine inside us:Gut microbes reports · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paulina ŚrednickaLaboratory of Biotechnology and Molecular Engineering, Department of Microbiology, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology - State Research Institute, Rakowiecka 36 Street, 02-532, Warsaw, Poland.
Marek Łukasz RoszkoDepartment of Food Safety and Chemical Analysis, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology - State Research Institute, Rakowiecka 36 Street, 02-532, Warsaw, Poland. marek.roszko@ibprs.pl.
Dominik PopowskiDepartment of Food Safety and Chemical Analysis, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology - State Research Institute, Rakowiecka 36 Street, 02-532, Warsaw, Poland.
Monika KowalczykLaboratory of Biotechnology and Molecular Engineering, Department of Microbiology, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology - State Research Institute, Rakowiecka 36 Street, 02-532, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał WójcickiLaboratory of Biotechnology and Molecular Engineering, Department of Microbiology, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology - State Research Institute, Rakowiecka 36 Street, 02-532, Warsaw, Poland.
Paulina EmanowiczLaboratory of Biotechnology and Molecular Engineering, Department of Microbiology, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology - State Research Institute, Rakowiecka 36 Street, 02-532, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena SzczepańskaDepartment of Food Safety and Chemical Analysis, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology - State Research Institute, Rakowiecka 36 Street, 02-532, Warsaw, Poland.
Danuta KotyrbaDepartment of Research, Scientific Information and Marketing Coordination, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology - State Research Institute, Rakowiecka 36 Street, 02-532, Warsaw, Poland.
Edyta Juszczuk-KubiakLaboratory of Biotechnology and Molecular Engineering, Department of Microbiology, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology - State Research Institute, Rakowiecka 36 Street, 02-532, Warsaw, Poland. edyta.juszczuk-kubiak@ibprs.pl.
Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota (GM) plays many key functions and helps maintain the host's health. Consequently, the development of GM cultivation under in vitro stimulating physiological conditions has gained extreme interest in different fields. In this study, we evaluated the impact of four culture media: Gut Microbiota Medium (GMM), Schaedler Broth (SM), Fermentation Medium (FM), and Carbohydrate Free Basal Medium (CFBM) on preserving the biodiversity and metabolic activity of human GM in batch in vitro cultures using PMA treatment coupled with 16S rDNA sequencing (PMA-seq) and LC-HR-MS/MS untargeted metabolomics supplemented with GC-MS SCFA profiling. Before the experiments, we determined the possibility of using the pooled faecal samples (MIX) from healthy donors (n = 15) as inoculum to reduce the number of variables and ensure the reproducibility of in vitro cultivation tests. Results showed the suitability of pooling faecal samples for in vitro cultivation study. Non-cultured MIX inoculum was characterized by higher α-diversity (Shannon effective count, and Effective microbial richness) compared to inocula from individual donors. After 24 h of cultivation, a significant effect of culture media composition on GM taxonomic and metabolomic profiles was observed. The SM and GMM had the highest α-diversity (Shannon effective count). The highest number of core ASVs (125) shared with non-cultured MIX inoculum and total SCFAs production was observed in the SM. These results might contribute to the development of standardized protocols for human GM in vitro cultivation by preventing methodological bias in the data.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeCulture MediaDNA, RibosomalFecesHumansMetabolomicsReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16STandem Mass SpectrometryCulture MediaDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID36810418
PMCPMC9945476
OpenAlexW4321452740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.