Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36810395›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Potential Haptic Perceptual Dimensionality of Rendered Compliance.

Zhiyu Shao, Jingwei Li, Wanlu Feng, Hongru Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhiyu ShaoSchool of Electrical, Energy and Power Engineering, Yangzhou University, No. 88 South University Road, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9337-4340
Jingwei LiSchool of Electrical, Energy and Power Engineering, Yangzhou University, No. 88 South University Road, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Wanlu FengSchool of Electrical, Energy and Power Engineering, Yangzhou University, No. 88 South University Road, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Hongru TangSchool of Electrical, Energy and Power Engineering, Yangzhou University, No. 88 South University Road, Yangzhou 225009, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62103358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have proven that humans perceive haptic textures through different perceptual dimensions, such as rough/smooth and soft/hard, which provide useful guidance in the design of haptic devices. However, few of these have focused on the perception of compliance, which is another important perceptual property in haptic interfaces. This research was conducted to investigate the potential basic perceptual dimensions of the rendered compliance and quantify the effects of the simulation parameters. Two perceptual experiments were designed based on 27 stimuli samples generated by a 3-DOF haptic feedback device. Subjects were asked to describe these stimuli using adjectives, classify the samples, and rate them according to corresponding adjective labels. Multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) methods were then used to project adjective ratings into 2D and 3D perception spaces. According to the results, hardness and viscosity are considered two basic perceptual dimensions of the rendered compliance, while crispness can be regarded as a subsidiary perceptual dimension. Then, the relations between simulation parameters and perceptual feelings were analyzed by the regression analysis. This paper may provide a better understanding of the compliance perception mechanism and useful guidance for the improvement of rendering algorithms and devices for haptic human-computer interaction.

Indexed as

compliance perceptionhaptic interfacehaptic perceptual dimensionshuman–computer interactionmultidimensional scaling

Identifiers

PMID36810395
PMCPMC9944077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.