ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Advances in Climbing Robots for Vertical Structures in the Past Decade: A Review.
Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and Experimental Verification of a Gibbon-Inspired Tree-Climbing Robot for Forestry Environments.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomimetic climbing robot design inspired by geckos and cats for rough wall applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Climbing Mechanism Design and Fuzzy PID-Based Control for a Stay Cable De-Icing Robot.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Design of a Modular Wall-Climbing Robot with Multi-Plane Transition and Cleaning Capabilities.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bioinspired Rigid-Flexible Coupled Adaptive Compliant Motion Control of Robot Gecko for Space Stations.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Controlling the motion of gas-lubricated adhesive disks using multiple vibration sources.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climbing robots are designed to conduct tasks that may be dangerous for humans working at height. In addition to improving safety, they can also increase task efficiency and reduce labor costs. They are widely used for bridge inspection, high-rise building cleaning, fruit picking, high-altitude rescue, and military reconnaissance. In addition to climbing, these robots need to carry tools to complete their tasks. Hence, their design and development are more challenging than those of most other robots. This paper analyzes and compares the past decade's design and development of climbing robots that can ascend vertical structures such as rods, cables, walls, and trees. Firstly, the main research fields and basic design requirements of climbing robots are introduced, and then the advantages and disadvantages of six key technologies are summarized, namely, conceptual design, adhesion methods, locomotion modes, safety mechanisms, control methods, and operational tools. Finally, the remaining challenges in research on climbing robots are briefly discussed and future research directions are highlighted. This paper provides a scientific reference for researchers engaged in the study of climbing robots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.