Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36810282›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2023

Listening to music during a repeated sprint test improves performance and psychophysiological responses in healthy and physically active male adults.

Nidhal Jebabli, Abderraouf Ben Aabderrahman, Daniel Boullosa, Hamdi Chtourou, Nejmeddine Ouerghi, Fatma Rhibi, Karuppasamy Govindasamy, Ayoub Saeidi, Cain C T Clark, Urs Granacher and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Music as an ergogenic aid in team sports: a systematic review.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effects of 440-HzPeerJ · 2025
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nidhal JebabliResearch Unit: Sport Sciences, Health and Movement, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Kef, UR22JS01, University of Jendouba, 7100, Kef, Tunisia.
Abderraouf Ben AabderrahmanHigher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar-Said, University of Manouba, Manouba, Tunisia. abderraouf.benabderrahman@issep.uma.tn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1351-8717
Daniel BoullosaINISA, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Hamdi ChtourouHigher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Nejmeddine OuerghiResearch Unit: Sport Sciences, Health and Movement, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Kef, UR22JS01, University of Jendouba, 7100, Kef, Tunisia.
Fatma RhibiM2S (Laboratoire Mouvement, Sport, Santé) - EA 1274, Univ Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France.
Karuppasamy GovindasamyDepartment of Physical Education and Sports Science, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamilnadu, India.
Ayoub SaeidiDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Kurdistan, Iran.
Cain C T ClarkCentre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Urs GranacherDepartment of Sport and Sport Science, Exercise and Human Movement Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. urs.granacher@sport.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-813X
Hassane ZouhalM2S (Laboratoire Mouvement, Sport, Santé) - EA 1274, Univ Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France. hassane.zouhal@univ-rennes2.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6743-6464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is well-documented that listening to music has the potential to improve physical performance during intense physical exercise. Less information is available on the timing of music application. This study aimed to investigate the effects of listening to preferred music during the warm up of a subsequent test or during the test on performance of repeated sprint sets (RSS) in adult males.

methodsIn a randomized cross-over design, 19 healthy males (age, 22.1 ± 1.2 years; body mass, 72.7 ± 9.3 kg; height, 1.79 ± 0.06 m; BMI, 22.6 ± 2.2 kg m

resultsFor performance indices during set 1 of the RSS test, we found a significant decrease in total sum sequence, fast time index and fatigue index in the listening to preferred music condition compared to the no music condition (total sum sequence: p = 0.006, d = 0.93; fast time index: p = 0.003, d = 0.67; fatigue index: p < 0.001; d = 1.30) and the listening to preferred music during the warm-up condition (fast time index: p = 0.002; d = 1.15; fatigue index: p = 0.006; d = 0.74). However, there was no significant effect of listening to preferred music on physical performance during set 2 of the RSS test. Compared to the no music condition, blood lactate concentrations were higher in the listening to preferred music during the test condition (p = 0.025; d = 0.92). In addition, listening to preferred music appears not to have an effect on heart rate, the pacing strategy profile, perceived exertion, and affective responses before, during and after the RSS test.

conclusionFindings from this study revealed that RSS performances were better (FT and FI indices) in the PMDT compared with the PMWU condition. Moreover, in set 1 of the RSS test, better RSS indices were found in the PMDT compared to NM condition.

Indexed as

Blood lactate concentrationFeeling scaleHeart ratePacing strategyRatings of perceived exertionRepeated sprint performance indices

Identifiers

PMID36810282
PMCPMC9945598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.