Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36810168›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Standard patient training versus Vik-Asthme chatbot-guided training: 'AsthmaTrain' - a protocol for a randomised controlled trial for patients with asthma.

Carey Meredith Suehs, Isabelle Vachier, David Galeazzi, François Vaast, Fanny Cardon, Nicolas Molinari, Arnaud Bourdin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05248126 (Standard Patient Training Versus Vik Chatbot Guided Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05248126 nacompletednot on this map

Standard Patient Training Versus Vik Chatbot Guided Training: a Randomized Controlled Trial for Asthma Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2022 to 2023Enrolled73ConditionsAsthmaArmsStandard patient education, Chatbot patient education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carey Meredith SuehsDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France careysuehs@protonmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2175-3496
Isabelle VachierDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
David GaleazziDepartment of Medical Information, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpelier, France.
François VaastDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Fanny CardonDepartment of Research and Innovation, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Nicolas MolinariDepartment of Medical Information, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpelier, France.
Arnaud BourdinDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4645-5209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTherapeutic education for patients with asthma has been shown to reduce asthma morbidity. The high availability of smart phones provides the opportunity to furnish patient training via specifically designed chatbot applications. The goal of this protocol is to perform a first pilot comparison of traditional face to face versus chatbot-guided patient therapeutic education programmes for patients with asthma. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eighty adult patients with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of asthma will be enrolled in a two-parallel-arm, randomised (1:1) controlled pilot trial. A single-Zelen consent procedure is deployed to first enrol all participants in the comparator arm, that is, the standard patient therapeutic education programme at the University Hospitals of Montpellier, France. This means of patient therapeutic education is based on reoccurring interviews and discussion with qualified nursing staff as per usual care. Following baseline data acquisition, randomisation will be performed. Those patients randomised to the comparator arm will not be informed of the second arm. Those patients randomised to the experimental arm will be proposed access to a specifically designed chatbot (Vik-Asthme) as the second tested means of patient training (refusals continue with standard training, though analysed as intention to treat). The primary outcome is change in the total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score at the end of follow-up (6 months). Secondary outcomes cover asthma control, spirometry, general health status, programme adherence and burden for medical staff, exacerbations and medical resource use (medications, consults, emergency visits, hospitalisation and intensive care). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study ('AsthmaTrain' protocol version 4-20220330) has been approved by the Committee for the Protection of Persons Ile-de-France VII on 28 March 2022 (reference number 21.03617.000059). Enrolment began on 24 May 2022. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05248126.

Indexed as

AsthmaCOVID-19AdultHumansPatientsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Adult thoracic medicineAsthmaMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING

Identifiers

PMID36810168
PMCPMC9945055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.