Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36810101›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2023

Fluid balance control in critically ill patients: results from POINCARE-2 stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial.

Pierre-Edouard Bollaert, Alexandra Monnier, Francis Schneider, Laurent Argaud, Julio Badie, Claire Charpentier, Ferhat Meziani, Michel Bemer, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Marie Buzzi and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02765009 (Effects of Fluid Balance Control in Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02765009 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Fluid Balance Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2016 to 2020Enrolled1,411ConditionsFluid Shifts, Critical CareArmsdiuretics, albumin, fluid restriction, renal replacement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. [The ROSE concept: modern fluid management in intensive care medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Article
  14. The times are changing: A primer on novel clinical trial designs and endpoints in critical care research.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Pierre-Edouard BollaertService de Réanimation Médicale, CHRU Nancy, Université de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.
Alexandra MonnierService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation Médicale, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, CHU Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Francis SchneiderService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, CHU Strasbourg, INSERM U 1121, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Laurent ArgaudService de Réanimation Médicale, Hospices civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69000, Lyon, France.
Julio BadieService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, 90015, Belfort, France.
Claire CharpentierService d'Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, CHRU Nancy, Université de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.
Ferhat MezianiService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation Médicale, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, CHU Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Michel BemerService de Réanimation Polyvalente, CHR Metz-Thionville, 57000, Thionville, France.
Jean-Pierre QuenotService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, 21000, Dijon, France.
Marie BuzziCIC, Epidémiologie Clinique, CHRU Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France. m.buzzi@chru-nancy.fr.
Hervé OutinService de Réanimation, CHI Poissy Saint-Germain, 78303, Poissy, France.
Cédric BruelService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 75000, Paris, France.
Laurent ZieglerService d'anesthésie Réanimation, CH Verdun, 55000, Verdun, France.
Sébastien GibotService de Réanimation Médicale, CHRU Nancy, Université de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.
Jean-Marc VirionCIC, Epidémiologie Clinique, CHRU Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.
Camille AlleyratCIC, Epidémiologie Clinique, CHRU Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.
Guillaume LouisService de Réanimation Polyvalente, CHR Metz-Thionville, 57000, Metz, France.
Nelly AgrinierCIC, Epidémiologie Clinique, CHRU Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.

Funding

Direction Générale de l'offre de Soins PHRC-14-0224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn critically ill patients, positive fluid balance is associated with excessive mortality. The POINCARE-2 trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of a fluid balance control strategy on mortality in critically ill patients.

methodsPOINCARE-2 was a stepped wedge cluster open-label randomized controlled trial. We recruited critically ill patients in twelve volunteering intensive care units from nine French hospitals. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old, under mechanical ventilation, admitted to one of the 12 recruiting units for > 48 and ≤ 72 h, and had an expected length of stay after inclusion > 24 h. Recruitment started on May 2016 and ended on May 2019. Of 10,272 patients screened, 1361 met the inclusion criteria and 1353 completed follow-up. The POINCARE-2 strategy consisted of a daily weight-driven restriction of fluid intake, diuretics administration, and ultrafiltration in case of renal replacement therapy between Day 2 and Day 14 after admission. The primary outcome was 60-day all-cause mortality. We considered intention-to-treat analyses in cluster-randomized analyses (CRA) and in randomized before-and-after analyses (RBAA).

resultsA total of 433 (643) patients in the strategy group and 472 (718) in the control group were included in the CRA (RBAA). In the CRA, mean (SD) age was 63.7 (14.1) versus 65.7 (14.3) years, and mean (SD) weight at admission was 78.5 (20.0) versus 79.4 (23.5) kg. A total of 129 (160) patients died in the strategy (control) group. Sixty-day mortality did not differ between groups [30.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 26.2-34.8 vs. 33.9%, 95% CI 29.6-38.2, p = 0.26]. Among safety outcomes, only hypernatremia was more frequent in the strategy group (5.3% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.01). The RBAA led to similar results.

conclusionThe POINCARE-2 conservative strategy did not reduce mortality in critically ill patients. However, due to open-label and stepped wedge design, intention-to-treat analyses might not reflect actual exposure to this strategy, and further analyses might be required before completely discarding it. Trial registration POINCARE-2 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02765009). Registered 29 April 2016.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessWater-Electrolyte BalanceAdolescentAgedHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsRespiration, ArtificialClinical trialComplex interventionCritical careWater-electrolyte balance

Identifiers

PMID36810101
PMCPMC9945675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.