SynthesisTrials2023
Electronic informed consent: effects on enrolment, practical and economic benefits, challenges, and drawbacks-a systematic review of studies within randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital informed consent for paediatric spinal surgery: a patient-centric evaluation of eConsent utilization.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Closing the Gap to Interventions for Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-Associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders (TAND): Protocol for a Longitudinal Study of TAND Severity, Predictors, and Caregiver Well-Being (TANDem-2).JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Emergency consent pathways in acute ischemic stroke trials: determinants, consequences, and stakeholder attitudes-an evidence-mapping study.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Observational, Multicenter study on long-term Effectiveness and tolerability of aliROcumab (OMERO): an Italian real-life experience.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- An asynchronous electronic consent for improving consent in research among patients with cancer.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Review
- Insights From a User Experience-Focused Virtual Study on the Feasibility and Challenges of Decentralized Clinical Trials.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Article
- Validating a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Improve Emergency Department Asthma Care: Protocol for an Observational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Exploring knowledge and attitudes toward electronic informed consent among clinical trial participants in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- The use of large language models to enhance cancer clinical trial educational materials.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Article
- Article
- Integrating a conceptual consent permission model from the informed consent ontology for software application execution.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Biostatistical challenges in multicenter clinical trials: Best practices for collaboration and data harmonization across institutions.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Patient and clinic staff perspectives on the implementation of a long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy program in an urban safety-net health system.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Decentralized Clinical Trials in Early Drug Development-A Framework Proposal.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2024Review
- Approaches and experiences implementing remote, electronic consent at the Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit.Trials · 2024Article
- Participant comprehension and acceptability of enhanced versus text-only electronic informed consent: an innovative qualitative pilot study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
- Article
- e-Consent in UK academic-led clinical trials: current practice, challenges and the need for more evidence.Trials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnrolment is one of the most challenging aspects of conducting clinical trials, preceded by the process of informed consent (IC). Different strategies to improve recruitment in clinical trials have been used, including electronic IC. During COVID-19 pandemic, barriers to enrolment have been evident. Although digital technologies were acknowledged as the future of clinical research and potential advantages were shown for recruitment, electronic informed consent (e-IC) has not yet been globally adopted. The purpose of this review is to investigate the effect of using e-IC on enrolment, practical and economic benefits, challenges, and drawbacks when compared to traditional informed consent, through a systematic review.
methodsEmbase, Global Health Library, Medline, and The Cochrane Library databases were searched. No limit was set for publication date, age, sex, or study design. We included all studies within a randomized controlled trial (RCT), published in English, Chinese or Spanish, evaluating the electronic consent process used in the parent RCT. Studies were included if any of the three components ((i) information provision, (ii) participant's comprehension, (iii) signature) of the IC process was designed as electronic, whether administered remotely or face-to-face. The primary outcome was the rate of enrolment to the parent trial. Secondary outcomes were summarized according to the various findings reported on the use of electronic consent.
resultsFrom a total of 9069 titles, 12 studies were included in the final analysis with a total of 8864 participants. Five studies of high heterogeneity and risk of bias showed mixed results on the efficacy of e-IC on enrolment. Data of included studies suggested e-IC could improve comprehension and recall of study-related information. Meta-analysis could not be conducted due to different study designs and outcome measures and the predominantly qualitative findings.
conclusionFew published studies have investigated the impact of e-IC on enrolment and findings were mixed. e-IC may improve participant's comprehension and recall of information. High-quality studies are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of e-IC to increase clinical trial enrolment.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42021231035 . Registration date: 19-Feb-2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.