Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36810078›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Application of antibiotic bone cement in the treatment of infected diabetic foot ulcers in type 2 diabetes.

Jiezhi Dai, Yu Zhou, Shasha Mei, Hua Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Research on the pathogenesis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcer wounds].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiezhi Dai *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yu Zhou *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Civil Aviation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Shasha MeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. 15502124912@163.com.
Hua ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. chuadr@aliyun.com.
Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital · CNShanghai Civil Aviation College · CN

Funding

a grant from the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission 20204Y0430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, we try to investigate the effect of antibiotic bone cement in patients with infected diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).

methodsThis is a retrospective study, including fifty-two patients with infected DFU who had undergone treated between June 2019 and May 2021. Patients were divided into Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) group and control group. 22 patients in PMMA group received antibiotic bone cement and regular wound debridement, and 30 patients in control group received regular wound debridement. Clinical outcomes include the rate of wound healing, duration of healing, duration of wound preparation, rate of amputation, and frequency of debridement procedures.

resultsIn PMMA group, twenty-two patients (100%) had complete wound healing. In control group, twenty-eight patients (93.3%) had wound healing. Compared with control group, PMMA group had fewer frequencies of debridement procedures and shorter duration of wound healing (35.32 ± 3.77 days vs 44.37 ± 7.44 days, P < 0.001). PMMA group had five minor amputation, while control group had eight minor amputation and two major amputation. Regarding the rate of limb salvage, there was no limb lose in PMMA group and two limb losses in control group.

conclusionThe application of antibiotic bone cement is an effective solution for infected DFU treatment. It can effectively decreased the frequency of debridement procedures and shorten the healing duration in patients with infected DFU.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic FootAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsHumansPolymethyl MethacrylateRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsPolymethyl MethacrylateAntibiotic bone cementDebridementDFUInfectionLimb salvage

Identifiers

PMID36810078
PMCPMC9942328
OpenAlexW4321457594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.